1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
umka2103 [35]
3 years ago
7

Giving notice is not legally required to establish the validity of an assignment, but it is a good idea for which of the followi

ng two reasons:
a. priority issues may arise when more than one person receives an assignment of the same rights
b. there is potential for fraudulent misrepresentation
c. the assignor might run off with the funds
d. there is the potential for discharge by performance to the wrong party
Law
1 answer:
professor190 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: a. priority issues may arise when more than one person receives an assignment of the same rights

d. there is the potential for discharge by performance to the wrong party

Explanation:

When notice is Given to establish the validity of an assignment,t it is always a good idea to avoid the issues of priority that may arise when two ur more persons receive an assignment of the same rights and also to avoid

the potential discharge performance to the wrong party .

You might be interested in
A dealer in U.S. government securities quotes a 5-year Treasury note at 89.12-89.16. In dollars, that represents a spread of
Korolek [52]

Answer:

money

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL GIVE 40 POINTS AND BRANLIEST
S_A_V [24]
It’s 10
Shejjejdjdjdbxhxgebnsx Dnnd hansjdbdbdbdbbdbdh
6 0
3 years ago
Please help!!<br> What can be done to begin to heal the political divisions we see today?
german

Answer:

change the world or rights something like that

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A state’s lieutenant governor is similar to which position at the federal level?
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer:

vice president

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
employers may be liable for the actions of their employees within the scope of employment. With regard to the actions of employe
Pavel [41]

The correct answer is; An employer might be liable for the actions of its employees outside the scope of employment if the employer was negligent or reckless in allowing it to occur, or for other reasons.

Further Explanation:

One way that an employer can be liable for the actions outside of work and can be considered negligent outside of work is if the employee is still clocked in at work. For example, if the employee is on a break and clocked in and hits and runs a car and someone gets hurt, the employer can be liable.

To be classified as an employee there are a few things that must be done by the employer such as;

  • Withhold income tax
  • Pay employers share of social security tax
  • Pay employers share of Medicare taxes
  • Provide unemployment insurance for all employees

Learn more about employee rights at brainly.com/question/7890057

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 13. On a two-week vacation in a neighboring state,
    9·1 answer
  • 1.Each state has its own constitution, separate from the United States Constitution. What do you think States would include in t
    5·1 answer
  • According to the laws of avation a bee is not able to fly.true or false​
    8·2 answers
  • When a suspected criminal is arrested, does the victim prosecute the suspected criminal and collect any fine imposed?
    13·2 answers
  • Question 13
    6·1 answer
  • What is blue spelled backwards
    6·1 answer
  • 5. How should a police officer respond to a bribe of $100?
    15·2 answers
  • True or false? Shooting a vicious animal is permitted in self-defense.
    11·1 answer
  • X
    12·1 answer
  • List all of the areas in which Article 1 section 8 of the US Constitution provides for federal employment and the spending of fe
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!