1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
7

By not accepting public finance contributions during the presidential campaign, barack Obama helped his cause because ___

History
1 answer:
aivan3 [116]3 years ago
5 0

By not accepting public finance contributions during the presidential campaign, Barack Obama helped his cause because ___ he was limited on how much money he could raise.

<em>Barack Obama raised around $153 million in September, 2008, this was a record in the campaign finance comparing with others candidates in history. He was even criticized for raising so much money that could cause in future fundraising abuses. If he applied for the public finance contributions he could not have raised so much money, because the public funds had rules which set a limit of spending to the grant you receive and do not allow you to take private contributions for your campaign.</em>

You might be interested in
Explain the effects of key events in WWII
zlopas [31]

Answer:

Victory of Hitler in attacking Poland encouraged him to attack Denmark and Norway. Later on he attacked Netherlands, Belgium and France. It is such that gave Germany the audacity to launch warfare on Great Britain. Hitler felt that the only way to make Britain surrender was to attack Soviet Union.

Explanation:

The Great Depression also allowed authoritarian rulers to come to power, which moved the world closer to war. One major effect of World War II was the use of nuclear weapons in war, which would later lead to the Cold War.

7 0
3 years ago
How was the boston massacre related to the acts of Parliament that came before it?
Setler79 [48]

Answer:

the troops were there in boston to enforce those acts

Explanation:

I just took the quiz and got this question correct!

3 0
2 years ago
Describe why the need for raw materials led to further state expansion.
Alexus [3.1K]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The need for raw materials led to further state expansion, following the Manifested Destiny that was the belief for many Americans that God's will was for America to expand its territories. After the Louisiana Purchase of 1803, US President ordered the Lewis & Clark expedition to the new Western territories. When the exédition was over, those explorers went to Washington D.C. to inform the President about the results. That is when Jefferson authorized people to settle those territories, work the land, and exploit the many raw materials and natural resources to get a profit.

4 0
3 years ago
Global warming has been linked to a decrease in
Bumek [7]

Global warming has been linked to a decrease in:

A. rate of carbon dioxide production  

B. size of the polar ice caps  

C. temperature of earth  

D. rate of species extinction.

Answer: B. size of the polar ice caps

3 0
3 years ago
What’s Alexander Hamilton least important contribution
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the draft which required young men to be ready for military or other service
    10·1 answer
  • Who was known for slightly raised roads on a foundation of crushed rock that drained well and help up to heavy traffic? (will gi
    13·1 answer
  • Unlike a direct democracy, in which all citizens decide laws, a representative democracy involves which of the following? A. law
    13·1 answer
  • Southern plantation owners invested heavily in early United States industry.<br> True<br> False
    5·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP
    9·2 answers
  • How did the Muslim culture expand so rapidly?
    5·2 answers
  • Need help Asap! Will mark you as brainliest
    7·1 answer
  • If Bond’s gym raises prices to your recommended price, how will this affect demand for their product? (10 points) please help
    15·1 answer
  • Which major even most contributed to the spread of islam?
    5·1 answer
  • Who controlled the economy in ancient mesopotamia?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!