Answer:
Expectancy Theory
Explanation:
The expectancy theory basically talks about how individuals will behave or react in a certain way because they are motivated and as a result choose to act in accordance or react to specific situations due to what they expect the results to be.
Answer:
remain actively aware of the fact that there is little or no connection between separate, objective competencies. Just because an individual scores highly in one area has no relation to how they will fare in other areas.
please mark me as the brainliest
hope it helps
Answer:
Direct material price variance= $5,000 unfavorable
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Standard cost per unit 3 pounds at $2 per unit
Actual cost per unit 2.5 pounds at $3 per unit
During the month, 5,000 pounds of raw materials were purchased.
<u>To calculate the direct material price variance, we need to use the following formula:</u>
Direct material price variance= (standard price - actual price)*actual quantity
Direct material price variance= (2 - 3)*5,000
Direct material price variance= $5,000 unfavorable
Answer:
True
Explanation:
This is the case because tax cuts and government spending are instruments that could be used in expansionary fiscal policy.
Note that reduced taxes usually have a direct impact on the disposable income of a economy not the composition of labor demand. Tax cuts leads directly to consumption and savings increase, resulting from increase in disposable income in the economy.
Answer (A):
Need more data to select the better adviser
<u>Explanation: </u>
Adviser A averaged 19% return on the investment which is more than that of Adviser B who averaged 16% return on investment. However, adviser A has a beta of 1.5 which is also greater than that of Adviser B who has a beta of 1. This means that adviser A made a more riskier investment and hence a higher average return on investment. We need more data to tell which adviser performed better in relation to each other.
Answer (B):
Investment Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
= T-bill rate = 6%
= Market return = 14%
= Market risk premium = 14% - 6% = 8%
= Average Return by Adviser A =19%
= Beta of Adviser A = 1.5
= Average Return by Adviser B =16%
= Beta of Adviser B = 1
CAPM Equation is 
<u>For Adviser A</u>
= 6 + 1.5 (14 - 6) = 18%
The expected average return for the investment is 18% which means that Adviser A over performed the market by 1 %
<u>For Adviser B</u>
= 6 + 1 (14 - 6) = 14%
The expected average return for the investment is 14% which means that the Adviser B over performed the market by 2 %
Clearly, Adviser B performed better than Adviser A.
Answer (C):
Adviser B
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u />
In this part, the 
and 
All else remains the same
We make similar calculation as in part B
