Answer:
D) $0
Explanation:
The depreciation method changed, but the previous depreciation expense has already been recorded and subject to taxes. Therefore the new straight line depreciation should start with the remaining asset value and calculate the depreciation expense for the remaining 6 years:
For example, if the purchase value was $1,200,000 (= $300,000 x 4), the remaining value would be $675,000 then the depreciation expense will be $112,500 per year during the next 6 years starting on year 9.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: means that the firm's cost structure is not to low enough to allow it to attractively price its products and that its products are not sufficiently differentiated to create value for its target customer.
Explanation:
To begin with, the term called<em> ''stuck in the middle''</em> is known in the business world for the main reason of <em>being stuck in a situation where the costs of the firms are to high</em> to allow them to have competitive and attractive prices and and that also<em> these companies do no differentiate their product enough</em> in the way to generate value to the customer they want to reach and therefore it is said that these firms are stuck in the middle due to the fact that <u><em>they can not improve their benefits</em></u> because of their high cost structure and low differentation.
Answer:
Explanation:
No matter what the future holds, an economics major helps people succeed. Understanding how decisions are made, how markets work, how rules affect outcomes, and how economic forces drive social systems will equip people to make better decisions and solve more problems. This translates to success in work and in life.
Answer: The Break-Even Point will reduce from $4,285.71 to $4,125
Explanation:
To get the Break-Even Point we can divide Fixed Assets by the Contribution margin.
The Contribution Margin is the Selling Price minus the Variable Cost.
For Scenario 1 the Break-Even Point will be,
= 15,000 / ( 6 - 2.50)
= $4,285.71
For Scenario 2 the Break-Even Point is,
= 16,500 / 6.5 -2.5
= $4,125
The Break-Even Point for Scenario 2 means that even though the higher Fixed Costs could have led to a higher Break-Even Point, the higher price contributed more than the fixed costs did and led to an ultimately lower Break-Even Point than the first Scenario.
