Answer:
The correct answer is option (C).
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Base year basket price = $5,000 billion
Year 2 basket price = $5,500 billion
So, we can calculate the consumer price index by using following formula:
Consumer price index = (Year 2 basket price ÷ Base year basket price ) × 100
By putting the value, we get
Consumer price index = ( $5,500 ÷ $5,000 ) × 100
= 1.1 × 100
= $110 billion
Answer:
D is not correct statement.
Explanation:
The statement which is not correct is d. the stockholders are required to pay taxes on dividends even if they are to be reinvested. So this statement is not correct and the rest all statements are correct for example, statement a is correct because when there is stock split then the number of outstanding stock will increase where as price per share will fall because there will be more number of stock for 1 stock. Statement b is also correct because usually when there is stock repurchase it signals company management that the stock is undervalued.
Answer:
A per se violation
Explanation:
A per se violation is one that violates antitrust laws for example agreements made that violates the Sherman antitrust act. It has adverse effects on the competitiveness of a market.
Sherman antitrust act of 1980 is aimed at regulating competitiveness in a market. It prohibits anticompetitive agreements, and unilateral activities that tries to monopolize a market.
In this scenario Omega corporation and precision products, inc., are the principal suppliers of their product in their market. They make an agreement that one will focus on retailers and the other on wholesalers.
This is an attempt to monopolize the market by the two principal suppliers, and is a violation of the Sherman antitrust act.
Answer:
a. revenue (R), affecting owner's investment (I)
b. not affecting owner's equity (NOE)
c. expense (E) and affecting owner's investment (I)
Explanation:
Revenues and Expense form Profits which are included in the statement of changes in equity through the Retained Income line item, thus these two also affect owners investment.
Answer: $35,000
Explanation:
Implicit costs can be described as opportunity cost : the cost that could have accrued to a resource owned by a firm if it had been put to another use.
Ralph could have earned $35,000 if he were employed elsewhere. Therefore, the $35,000 is the opportunity cost of owning his pizza hut. It is the implicit cost.
The other costs in the question are explicit costs.
I hope my answer helps you.
