Americans could hire immigrants for really low wages because the immigrants had no other choice. Immigrants influenced the American economy.
If you're trying to fill in the blanks, then the answers are already there. They are at the end of the each line.
Deists like <u>Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin</u> endorsed the concept of supreme being...
All the following are true of the Second Great Awakening except that it was <u>not as large as the first Great Awakening.</u>
As a revivalist preacher, <u>Charles Grandison Finney</u> advocated opposition to slavery...
... Baptists William Miller is least related to <u>Brigham Young, Book of Mormon, Salt Lake City, polygamy</u>
...angered many non-Mormons was their emphasis on <u> cooperative or group effort</u>
Tax supported public education was deemed essential for <u>social stability and democracy.</u>
...New England reformer <u>Dorothea Dix</u>...
...stemmed from the hard and <u>monotonous life of many</u>
...from the wave of <u>nationalism</u> that followed...
Hope this helps!!!
They learned how to use their weapon which was sturdy and made out of bronze. They also learned how to steer horse-drawn chariots.
Answer:
Its probably A
Explanation:
I don't really think that any of those arguments are actually good. However, answer B is wrong because political parties won't necessarily lose financial support if somebody votes against them. it also doesn't really fit as an argument to why you should vote even though the other party will probably win. Number C is not logical because you don't just strt parties because the party you support loses. That way all the existing parties will lose votes and not only the ones you are against. Answer D is just a very bad argument. Think about, would you change where you proably live all your life just because they have more influence on the vote? What about your job, friends and family. And if they mean for you to fly or ride to another state just to vote and then come back, that bad too because it's expensive.
The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or Sherman Compromise) was an agreement that large and small states reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 that in part defined the legislative structure and representation that each state would have under the United States Constitution. It retained the bicameral legislature as proposed by Roger Sherman, along with proportional representation of the states in the lower house, but required the upper house to be weighted equally between the states. Each state would have two representatives in the upper house.
