Answer:
Fred's immediate need for money
Explanation:
Crime is generally the function of human decision-making process. Potential offender do weighs the costs and benefits of an illegal act. That is the pros and cons.
Classical Criminology is a compilation of different theory of crime stating criminal behavior as an issue, consideration or matter of personal choice usually made after individual consider it costs and benefit, and that the criminal behavior shows the inherent the needs of the offender.
Offense-Specific Crime
Holds the theory or view that an offender tend to reacts in a selective manner or approach to the characteristics of a particular criminal act.
Offender-Specific Crime simply holds the notion or view that offenders weigh their skills, motives, needs, and fears before deciding to commit the criminal act.
Fred immediate need for money is still not a crime yet. It is what he does to answer that needs be it illegal makes it a crime.
The correct answer would be, Beth is likely a victim of Gender Discrimination.
Explanation:
Beth a female who is an attorney from top 10 law schools, but she has been given extremely small bonuses as compared to her male counterparts. Those male counterparts have the same level of pedigree and work product, as Beth has, but male counterparts are given more bonuses than Beth.
This is truly an example of Gender Discrimination, in which one gender is given favors as compared to the other gender just on the basis of sex. It does not matter if the skills and competencies of both genders are same, if one of the gender is given more importance, it is called gender discrimination with the other one.
In the given example, when Beth has the same level of skills and work experience as her counterparts have, and she is getting less bonuses than them, this shows that Beth is a victim of Gender Discrimination, where males are being given more favors than females.
Learn more about Gender Discrimination at:
brainly.com/question/11762456
#LearnWithBrainly
In 2014, about 65% Americans believed that stem-cell research is morally acceptable. This number shows a continous improvement from the previous years and shows no sign of slowing down, which opened up a really wide opportunities for funding to came in and accelerate our knowledge for this field and its applications in human lfie.
These are the three that have to do with social matters, and thus historians' answers would be influenced by their social ideology:
- 2 )How did the Harlem Renaissance affect American culture as a whole during the 1920s?
- 3) How did desegregation affect the white and black populations of Alabama?
- 6) How did religious intolerance impact different groups of immigrants in early America?
As for the other answers:
- 1) has to do with politics/government or political science. (How were colonial constitutions in America different from British colonial charters?)
- 4) has to do with diplomatic history / international relations. (What was the diplomatic relationship between the United States and the USSR after World War II ended?)
- 5) has to do with military history. (What weapons were most effective in World War I combat?)
The three items I noted at first all concern social/cultural topics, and so would be influenced by a historian's own social ideology.