Question

William Young formed an oral contract with Edward Drury to buy several carloads of tomatoes. Afterward, Drury wrote a memorandum on his own letterhead for his personal records. The memo contained all the terms of the agreement, including Young's name, but it was not signed by either party. Drury stored the memo in his home safe. Subsequently, Drury wrote Young a letter stating that he would not sell the tomatoes as agreed. Young filed a lawsuit in a Maryland state court seeking to enforce the contract. Drury contended that the contract was subject to the Statute of Frauds and that because it was not in writing, it could not be enforced. Young claimed that the memo and letter together constituted writings sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds. The court most likely held that the Statute of Frauds was __________________

Answer 1

Answer: Satisfied by the writings, because the court was not concerned with the form or custody of the writings.

Explanation:

I know the answer because I love Social studies or history .