1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nignag [31]
3 years ago
6

This is for my unit test pls help!

History
1 answer:
Maru [420]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

China is the answer for the question.

You might be interested in
What did the Puritans, Quakers, and Catholics living in England in the 1600s all have in common?
IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

Puritans, Quakers, and Catholics were living in England in the 1600s they all suffered persecution in England for their beliefs

Explanation:

the last one....because i'm right

5 0
2 years ago
Some people argue against multinational corporations because they believe that ______________ causes a loss of jobs in a home co
fenix001 [56]
Outsourcing 
i hope i got it right
3 0
2 years ago
Anti federalist papers in a sentence
marysya [2.9K]
The anti federalist papers was a proposal that opposed ratification of creating a stronger government system than the articles of confederation
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In an economic downturn, what can happen in countries that depend on high taxes to fund social programs?
vova2212 [387]

If there's an economic downturn in a country where the taxes are very high, and those taxes are used for the funding of the numerous social programs, than the country can very quickly face high rates of poverty and maybe even an internal conflict.

If the economy suddenly starts to crumble, the people that work would not be able to support themselves with the paying of very high taxes, thus they will rebel against that in order for the taxes to be lowered down.

On the other hand, that will result in little to no funding for the social programs. That will bring in revolt in the people that are very poor and need those programs, but also the people that do not work by their will but have relied on those money.

These two sides of the picture can easily bring in a lot of violence, tensions, even a revolution.

3 0
3 years ago
in Schenck v. United States when did the supreme court say speech could be more dangerous to the country
Len [333]

The correct answer is During a time of war.

The Schenck vs. United States Supreme Court case deals with the issue of freedom of speech during the World War I era. In this case, Schenck was using his freedom of speech to convince people to avoid the military draft that was taking place in the United States. The Supreme Court ruled that this is not protected free speech, as this speech presented a clear and present danger to American society, especially since this was done during World War I.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • You want to buy a new cell phone that costs $80 and two new video games that cost $40 each, but you don't have enough money save
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the Cold War an important turning point in world history?
    15·2 answers
  • In what ways is knowledge "bread "
    5·2 answers
  • 8. this constitutional amendment gave women the national right to vote
    5·1 answer
  • Which constitutional principle best protects the public from abuse by one branch of government?
    7·1 answer
  • what argument does paine use to illustrate the geographic inconvenience of being ruled by great britain
    13·1 answer
  • Where did the Homestead Act encourage freed African Americans to settle?
    7·2 answers
  • Who were American Leaders at The Battle at Lexington and Concord
    9·1 answer
  • How are you doing? Tell me the truth:)
    8·1 answer
  • In order to oversee airport security, the government created
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!