Answer: it’s network protocol
Explanation:
user input I think I'm not sure though
Answer:
Goals help provide our everyday lives with structure, and operate similarly at the institutional level, offering organizations a low cost method of encouraging motivation, communication and accountability. In short, goals help organizations to achieve a variety of ends—including the reduction of energy waste.
Energy efficiency improvement goals, also known as energy efficiency targets, are intended reductions in energy over a specified time frame that have been defined in a SMART manner. Targets are useful because they can encourage decision makers to improve the use of energy in their communities and operations. Moreover, energy efficiency targets can have short or long term timeframes and can be implemented on various scales, ranging from the national level down to individual buildings. Cities should explore both mandatory public sector targets and voluntary private sector targets to forge energy-efficient communities.
Answer:
29
Explanation:
for n=28:
--------------
Algorithm 1 performs f(n) = n2 + n/2 = 28*28 + 28/2 = 798
Algorithm 2 performs f(n) = 12*28 + 500 = 836
for n=29
--------------
Algorithm 1 performs f(n) = n2 + n/2 = 29*29 + 29/2 = 855.5
Algorithm 2 performs f(n) = 12*29 + 500 = 848
so, for n=29, algorithm 2 will be faster than algorithm 1
Answer:
Options Include:
<em>A) Server-side validation
</em>
<em>B) Client-side validation
</em>
<em>C) Validate in trust
</em>
D) Client-side and server-side validation
<em>Client-side and server-side validation is Correct</em>
Explanation:
The best option is to validate the client side with the server side. Using these together would provide the best testing option for Sharon.
<em>This keeps user feedback instantly without wasting postbacks while also protecting against JavaScript disabled users. That's how the validation controls for ASP.NET operate. </em>
This is definitely not over-engineering as there are risks of using one without the other.
Individual validation on the server side and individual validation on the client side are both incorrect. Trust validation is not a form of validation.
