Step-by-step explanation:
12g=12(2/3g-1)+ 11
12g=24/3g-12+11
12g-24/3g=-1
12g-8g=-1
4g=-1
g=-1/4
I'm pretty sure
<span>B. Draw a diagram. Draw a line and label it 2 ft. Draw a line twice as long and label it 4 ft. Do this three more times. Keep doubling the distance each time to find how far the frog jumped on the 5th jump
is correct</span>
Answer:
A) The amount of spread in the middle-half of Baltimore's data is greater than Seattle's
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
D
Step-by-step explanation:
5+7(8r-2)
5+56r-14
-9+56r=56r-9
d
Answer:
b). There is little to no evidence to conclude the mean driving time for the alternative route is different from the mean driving time of the detour.
Step-by-step explanation:
The most adequate statement to examine the proposition is that 'there is lack of adequate evidence to substantiate the claim that the mean time taken for driving through the detour and the alternative route is distinct.' This will help in testing that <u>there is a lack of evidence to establish the validity or truth of the proposition that if the detour is actually shorter than the alternative route or not</u>. No data has been provided to clarify that the mean driving time in both routes traveled by Sarah was varied. Hence, <u>option b</u> is the correct answer.
