1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
KATRIN_1 [288]
3 years ago
8

The reason the eastern luxuries Were expensive.

History
2 answers:
NNADVOKAT [17]3 years ago
8 0

reasons that eastern luxuries were expensive because it cost a lot of money to produce them and it was used to dignify status. Luxury goods are said to have high income elasticity of demand: as people become wealthier

Nostrana [21]3 years ago
4 0
They were expensive because they were rare in the west. They were rare, because the ways to bring them were a very long, dangerous and otherwise expensive trade routes, either through central Asia or through the Indian and Arabic peninsula coast, and later (after Vasco da Gama) around Africa.
You might be interested in
How is this portion of the U.S. Constitution related to the principles of our government?
Ratling [72]
Federalism meaning power is shared between the national and state governments. Separation of powers into branches that make, enforce or interpret laws. Balance of Power - controls (checks) can be made on the other branches. Limited government - everyone is bound by the US Constitution.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The picture above depicts a camp meeting during the Second Great Awakening. Which of the following best describes what happened
Mandarinka [93]

A:  These religious meetings, held outdoors and in tents, were believed to inspire people to confess their sins and examine their personal religious beliefs.

I took the test and got it correct.

7 0
3 years ago
Which side repeatedly lost major battles in the early years of the war?
lidiya [134]

Answer:

the British and the french

8 0
3 years ago
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the graph to answer the question that follows.
Kruka [31]

When the price of the good is above 50 dollars the quantity demanded would be less than 100 units.

<h3>How does price affect demand?</h3>

The price of a good is known to have an inverse relationship with the quantity of the good that would be bought by its consumers.

The equilibrium price and quantity is at 50  $ and 100 respectively. If the price of the commodity rises above 50, people would demand less for the good.

Read more on demand and supply here:

brainly.com/question/4804206

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What protected Egypt from an invasion?​
    12·1 answer
  • At the beginning of the war, how did the new military technology affect the way european leaders thought about the war?
    10·1 answer
  • One Roman emperor was particularly bad. He not only had his own mother killed, but castrated then married his favorite slave. To
    15·1 answer
  • Which country helped America finally win its independence in 1781?
    7·1 answer
  • Who were washingtons four cabinet members and what were their titles
    6·2 answers
  • Which kingdoms have photosynthesis organisms?
    8·2 answers
  • What fueled the age of exploration and why did China and Japan withdraw into isolation?
    13·1 answer
  • 3 main reasons europeans sot to explore and colonize the “new world”
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP 100 POINTS
    13·2 answers
  • Paine agrees that America should become independent because Britain intends to
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!