<u>In general, how do empires fall apart?</u>
<em>Most</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>common</em><em> </em><em>reasons</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>probably</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>reduction</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>wealth</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>power</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>Not</em><em> </em><em>enough</em><em> </em><em>money</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>afford</em><em> </em><em>an</em><em> </em><em>army</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>mass</em><em> </em><em>poverty</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>wrong</em><em> </em><em>decisions</em><em> </em><em>made</em><em> </em><em>regarding</em><em> </em><em>policies</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>government</em>
<u>In what ways were the Han and Roman Empire</u><u>s alike? </u>
<em>They</em><em> </em><em>are</em><em> </em><em>alike</em><em> </em><em>because</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>their</em><em> </em><em>similar</em><em> </em><em>military</em><em> </em><em>techniques</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>methods</em><em>.</em><em> </em><em>They both had a centralized, bureaucratic government</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>b</em><em>oth Rome and Han established their territories through defending and fighting for their land.</em><em> </em><em>Also</em><em> </em><em>its</em><em> </em><em>worth</em><em> </em><em>mentioning</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> </em><em>their</em><em> </em><em>r</em><em>0</em><em>ads and defensive walls</em><em> </em><em>were</em><em> </em><em>quite</em><em> </em><em>similar</em><em> </em><em>as</em><em> </em><em>well</em><em>.</em>
<u>In what ways were the Han and Roman </u><u>Empires</u><u> </u><u>different</u><u>?</u>
<em>T</em><em>he Han Dynasty was based on Confucian philosophy</em><em> </em><em>while the Romans worshipped many gods and believed in strict military discipline. The Romans were more aggressive than the Chinese, who were often just as content to rely on diplomacy and foreign trade</em>
Hope this helped you, have a good day bro cya)
Social Darwinism was used to justify all of the following except "communism," since in fact communism sought in many ways to combat social darwinism, but ensuring that there were no class divisions within society, and the wealth was shared among all.
Answer:
the foreign merchants brang new idea's and beliefs,along with trade goods.
Answer:
Again, just as the largest measure of responsibility in the government of the nation rests upon local self-government so does the largest measure of social responsibility in our country rest upon the individual.
Our system, based upon the ideals of individual initiative and of equality of opportunity, is not an artificial thing. Rather it is the outgrowth of experience of America, and expresses the faith and spirit of our people.
Explanation:
"Rugged individualism" is the term that defends the idea that citizens should be responsible for their own success and for the harmony and comfort of the region in which they live, and the State should not interfere, or interfere very little in what is related to that responsibility.
In short, the term removes government responsibility for the welfare and success of the individuals it governs. This term was widely used by President Herbert Hoover and can be seen in the two sentences shown above.
Reign of terror............................................................................i believe