1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Valentin [98]
3 years ago
5

1. In the case, the court focused on the language of the contract. In the contract, the Desses agreed to fully disclose all info

rmation about the property. Further, under the terms of the contract, it was agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on the Desses’ disclosures. Would the Desses have had a stronger case if the contract was silent as to which parties could rely on the Desses’ disclosures?
Business
2 answers:
Reil [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

The Desses would have had a stronger argument if the contract was silent in this way because it would have been less likely that there was a designated class of third-party beneficiaries under the contract.

Cheers

Ilya [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Yes, if the agreement between the Desses and Sirva had not included "prospective buyers" then they would have probably not been sued, instead Sirva would have been sued directly. The Kincaids would not have been considered third party beneficiaries of the agreement between the Desses and Sirva.  

Explanation:

This case is about a real estate property sold, where the sellers (Desses) agreed to fully disclose all information about the property to the real estate agent (Sirva) and prospective buyers (Kincaids). After the Kincaids bought the property, they found that it had several undisclosed problems, like rotten windows, mold, dampened walls, etc., which the Desses should have disclosed but didn't.

The Kincaids sued alleging rights as third part beneficiaries since they were considered prospective buyers. In this case, the court ruled that the Kincaids name did not have to appear in the contract between Sirva and the Desses in order to be considered third party beneficiaries since they contracted with Sirva to purchase the house. So the court allowed the Kincaids to sue the Desses directly, and ruled in their favor.

If the agreement between the Desses and Sirva had not included "prospective buyers" then they would have probably not been sued, instead Sirva would have been sued directly.  

You might be interested in
What decision rule should be followed when deciding if a business segment should be eliminated?
dusya [7]
Here is the answer of the given question above. The decision rule that should be followed when deciding if a business segment should be eliminated is this: Segments with revenues which are less than avoidable expenses should be considered for elimination. <span>Unavoidable expense are those expense which will continue to be incurred whether segment is continued or discontinued. Hope this helps.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it important to invest
Svetradugi [14.3K]

it's important to invest so you can have a better life once that thing you invested in makes you money and not all of them do so keep that in mind

3 0
3 years ago
Billy isn't sure he'll be able to rise to the challenge of pitching to a very important client at work, but his supervisor selec
lidiya [134]

Answer:

d. blind

Explanation:

The Johari window label is used to provide an explanation of the relationship between employers and employees. It gives an explanation of some psychological issues that inform the behavior of these two groups. The quadrant of the Johari window labeled <em>blind reveals what the employer knows about the employee, but the employee does not know that about himself due mostly to a lack of self-awareness.</em> This is the case between Billy and his employer who knows about his ability to pitch a deal, but which Billy is not so confident about.

The employer could help Billy overcome the problem of lack of self-awareness by encouraging him to reveal information about himself.

4 0
3 years ago
Percent of all profits and losses, this extra allocation indicates total goodwill of $150,000, which must be split among all par
ivann1987 [24]
This fact is true, but is this a question?
8 0
3 years ago
Do you think the efforts of Brazil's government to keep the economy growing will e successful
myrzilka [38]
No...........I don't think so
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Vignana corporation manufactures and sells hand-painted clay figurines of popular sports heroes. shown below are some of the cos
    5·1 answer
  • The classical economists felt that saving would be equal to investment because
    15·1 answer
  • The​ real-income effect of a price change is most significant when
    15·1 answer
  • Even though eggs are a significant source of cholesterol, what other information on the nutrition label should tom consider if h
    9·1 answer
  • John has finally gotten to the point where he can put away some money and start a rainy day fund. He wants to have access to his
    7·1 answer
  • A salad is served as a first course and the main part of the meal will be served later. two forks are part of the place setting.
    13·1 answer
  • A firm in a perfectly competitive market has a fixed cost of $1,000 and a variable cost of $500 while it is earning the revenue
    12·1 answer
  • A policy of permitting the people of a country to buy and sell where they please, without restrictions, is called:
    11·1 answer
  • In a large company, a small team of employees is tasked with conducting monthly tests of security controls. Each month, they sel
    12·2 answers
  • In this unit, you learned about using the internet for business purposes. What forms of business communication rely on the inter
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!