Answer:
1. Reputation.
Apple and IBM are big companies which is why their reputation was able to survive the bribery charges. You are most likely not as big as either of these companies so if you are charged with bribery, your reputation might not be able to recover like theirs did.
It is always best to be associated with a good reputation. A good reputation gives you customers who will be loyal because they appreciate the integrity you have. You should not throw this away by bribing people.
2. Consequences.
It is because Apple and IBM are so big that they were able to settle the bribery charge with the Courts. Smaller companies or people that have lesser effects on the financial system might find that their punishments will be more severe to act as a deterrent.
Answer:
Yield to maturity is 3.94%
Explanation:
Yield to maturity is the annual rate of return that an investor receives if a bond bond is held until the maturity.
Face value = F = $1,000
Coupon payment = $1,000 x 9% = $90/2 = $45 semiannually
Selling price = P = $1080
Number of payment = n = 10 years x 2 = 20
Yield to maturity = [ C + ( F - P ) / n ] / [ (F + P ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $45 + ( 1000 - 1080 ) / 20 ] / [ (1,000 + 1080 ) / 2 ]
Yield to maturity = [ $45 - 4 ] / 1040 = $41 /1040 = 0.394 = 3.94%
First use the formula of the future value of an annuity ordinary to find the yearly payments
Fv=pmt [(1+r)^(n)-1)÷r]
Fv future value 40000
PMT yearly payment?
R interest rate 0.02
N time 8 years
Solve the formula for PMT
PMT=Fv÷[(1+r)^(n)-1)÷r]
PMT=40,000÷(((1+0.02)^(8)−1)
÷(0.02))
=4,660.39
Now use the formula of the present value of an annuity ordinary to find the present value
Pv=pmt [(1-(1+r)^(-n))÷r]
PV present value?
PMT yearly payments 4660.39
R interest rate 0.02
N time 8 years
Pv=4,660.39×((1−(1+0.02)^(−8))÷(0.02))
pv=34,139.60. ....answer
Answer:
If the given situation turns into a legal dispute: Option D: the Court is likely to find that this is a unilateral mistake. However, since Builders knew (or should have known) that there was a mistake, the supplier will not be held to the $3,000 quote.
Explanation:
Builders requested a bid from the supplier and while answering the bid, supplier made an error.
Unilateral mistake is the one in which only one party commits a mistake. The party that doesn't make the mistake gets to know about the mistake done by the other party. The contract is then made voidable by the mistaken party.
A voidable contract is like a formal agreement which is made between the two parties in which contract is decided to be made not enforced in case of any legal reason. It may include, if any of the party is not able to disclose a fact or a mistake, misrepresentation or any undue influence by someone on any of the parties. Thus, in the given case, court will ,likely find this as unilateral fault.
