That statement is true.
The intention of excluding the children is to ensure that they wouldn't be exposed to any negative effects from the alteration made during the research.
But an argument could be made that if we truly want to collect the data about a certain effect<span> therapeutic agents in children, including them in research might be necessary.
</span>
Mai uses her mother as a secure base from which to explore her environment. The type of baby mai would be classified as <u>securely attached.</u>
<u />
The environment can be described as a sum general of all of the residing and non-dwelling elements and their results that affect human existence. whilst all living or biotic factors are animals, flowers, forests, fisheries, and birds, non-dwelling or abiotic elements include water, land, sunlight, rocks, and air.
Environment plays an important position in wholesome living and the lifestyles of life on planet earth. Earth is a domestic for one of a kind dwelling species and we all are depending on the surroundings for meals, air, water, and different desires. consequently, it is essential for every individual to keep and shield our environment.
Learn more about Environment here brainly.com/question/17413226
#SPJ4
Answer:
Yes. Such an action constitutes a tort and a crime.
Explanation:
A tort is a wrong done to another person while a crime is the breaking of the law of the state or Federal government. Put simply, a tort is a wrongdoing on a personal level while a crime is a wrongdoing on a societal level, while tort is privately morally wrong, crime is publicly legally wrong.
In the scenario above there is a 'tort' because the employees are spitting into the food of those they do not like. This is on a personal level as they are not spitting into the food of every customer but only the food of those they dislike. Also, a crime exists because this is happening at a public place. It can be said that those restaurants are intentionally serving unhealthy foods to members of the public and both the owners and employees of those restaurants could be charged.
Answer:
MLK is a very good example. He led non violent protests and such, it made a difference and there peaceful protests worked
Explanation:
I'm not too sure if it's social change tho, lmk if i"m wrong, I'll delete the answer so someone else can answer
