Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the B) It recalls the sculptured fronts of late antique sarcophagi.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that resorting to examples from antique sarcophagi seems to be very logical, due to the rectangular shape of the frieze at St. Trophîme and to the fact that it is set against the wall of the building and that it features a series of figures placed next to each other, almost as in a procession. Most Roman sarcophagi had the shape of a rectangular box and they were only decorated on the front and the two short sides. In addition, late antique sarcophagi started to feature Christian iconography, so the artists working at St. Trophîme surely found them useful as models.
Answer: It can be proven using objective evidence.
Explanation:
Factual information can be proven by objective evidence based on research into the information. Information that is not factual can also be proven to be baseless by the same method.
If indeed therefore, that the above scenario can be proven by objective evidence then it would be considered factual. Should there be an investigation and the evidence is not objective, this would not have been factual.
Of stagnant waters, altar sword and pen.
Altar refers to religion, sword refers to military, and pen refers to art and literature.
The pen used to describe art and literature is use of metonymy
I am sorry I don’t understand
B.Correlative as or is relating one suggestion to the other
