Who was John Brown? What did he believe?

History

1 answer:

Yuliya22 [10]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

John Brown was an American abolitionist. Brown advocated the use of armed insurrection to overthrow the institution of slavery in the United States. He first gained national attention when he led small groups of volunteers during the Bleeding Kansas crisis of 1856. He was dissatisfied with the pacifism of the organized abolitionist movement: "These men are all talk. What we need is action—action!" In May 1856, Brown and his supporters killed five supporters of slavery in the Pottawatomie massacre, which responded to the sacking of Lawrence by pro-slavery forces. Brown then commanded anti-slavery forces at the Battle of Black Jack and the Battle of Osawatomie.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

5 points

Brilliant_brown [7]

Rio grandma give me my 5 points

5 0

2 years ago

Helppppp me with this one plssss

Pachacha [2.7K]

Answer:

The union has more states. Since, the union has more states that means they have more advantage because they have more power than the confederate states.

Explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What is the democratic party and how does it relate to andrew jackson?

zepelin [54]

Answer:

The Democratic Party was the party of slavery, and is the party of unequal treatment based on race, rather than equal opportunity based on merit.

Explanation:

Andrew Jackson was related to the Democratic Party, as it was widely known with it's history of impeding on people's rights based on skin-color or national origin. He also was the embodiment of many of the beliefs of the Democratic Party. Firstly, he embraced the usage of slavery, and was a ardent holder of slaves. The Democratic Party had always worked for keeping the institution of slavery as a means of not only workforce and profit, but also as a way to degrade "non-whites" into being second-class humans, (also commonly known as sub-humans). Piggy-backing off of the issue of slavery, Jackson also campaigned against many of the Native American tribes that were located to the west of the then-US, starting wars and taking lands from the defeated Native American tribes. Again, the Native American tribes were classified as sub-humans, and did not receive any benefits that would generally be implied to a white-US citizen.

This led to the unpopularity of Jackson within the Whig-Republican circles, and he was succeeded by Martin van Buren.

4 0

2 years ago

The<br> one long term effect of King Philip's War

Inessa05 [86]

Hey hope your doing well the long term effect of King Philips War is the destruction of families and communities. Hope this helped you!!

4 0

2 years ago

how did world war I impact russia differently than it did western european countries A. Russia experienced economies difficult.

wolverine [178]

Answer:

Its C :) Have a great day!

Explanation:

As the answer above stated

3 0

3 years ago