1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NeX [460]
3 years ago
9

Required information The Foundational 15 [LO6-1, LO6-2, LO6-3, LO6-4, LO6-5] [The following information applies to the questions

displayed below.] Diego Company manufactures one product that is sold for $73 per unit in two geographic regions—the East and West regions. The following information pertains to the company’s first year of operations in which it produced 56,000 units and sold 51,000 units. Variable costs per unit: Manufacturing: Direct materials $ 24 Direct labor $ 16 Variable manufacturing overhead $ 2 Variable selling and administrative $ 3 Fixed costs per year: Fixed manufacturing overhead $ 784,000 Fixed selling and administrative expense $ 672,000 The company sold 38,000 units in the East region and 13,000 units in the West region. It determined that $300,000 of its fixed selling and administrative expense is traceable to the West region, $250,000 is traceable to the East region, and the remaining $122,000 is a common fixed expense. The company will continue to incur the total amount of its fixed manufacturing overhead costs as long as it continues to produce any amount of its only product. Foundational 6-7 7. What is the amount of the difference between the variable costing and absorption costing net operating incomes (losses)?
Business
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

<u>The absorption costing </u>method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable. The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead.

<u>The variable costing method</u> incorporates all variable production costs (direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead).

<u>Variable costing income statement:</u>

Total unitary variable production cost= (24 + 16 + 2 + 3)= $45

Sales= 73*51,000= 3,723,000

Total variable cost= 51,000*45= (2,295,000)

Contribution margin= 1,428,000

Fixed manufacturing overhead= (784,000)

Fixed selling and administrative expense= (672,000)

Net operating income= (28,000)

<u>Absorption costing income statement:</u>

Unitary production cost= (24 + 16 + 2) + (784,000/56,000)

Unitary production cost= $56

Sales= 73*51,000= 3,723,000

COGS= 51,000*56= (2,856,000)

Gross profit= 867,000

Total selling and administrative= 672,000 + 3*51,000= (825,000)

Net operating income= 42,000

<u>The difference between both methods is the fixed manufacturing overhead allocated in ending inventory.</u>

You might be interested in
The following events occurred for Johnson Company: a. Received investment of $39,000 cash by organizers and distributed 1,190 sh
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer:

Cash 39.000 debit

  Common Stock       1,190 credit

  Additional Paid-in 37,810 credit

Equipment  7,100 debit

  Cash                  1,300 credit

  Note payable   5,800 credit

Cash    15,000 debit

 Note payable 15,000 credit

Explanation:

We debit the cash received and credit the face value of the common stock

the difference is label as additional paid-in common stock which, is also credited.

as the equipment is worth 7,100 and we paid 1,300 cash the differnece: 7,100 - 1,300 = 5,800 is the principal of the note signed

As the equipment which enters the firm is  an asset it wil lbe debited.

the cash is being used thus, credited and the note is a liability hence credit as well

the third event consist of a inflow of cash thus debit and taking a liability therefore, credit.

8 0
3 years ago
A company reports the amounts below in its financial statements. Net cash flow from operating activities $37,570 Total net cash
balandron [24]

Answer:

Ratio will be 0.92

So option (A) will be the correct option

Explanation:

We have given net cash flow from operating activities = $37570

So net operating cash flow = $37570

Current liabilities at the bugging of the year = $38400

Current liabilities at the end of the year = $43200

So average current liabilities =\frac{38400+43200}{2}=$40800

We have to find the ratio of operating cash flow to current liabilities

So ratio will be =\frac{37570}{40800}=0.92

So option (A) will be the correct option

3 0
3 years ago
Make a simple poem regarding the learning’s that you acquired in managing the finances. (4 Stanzas only with rhyme and with no m
dangina [55]

Answer:

My net worth is my assets less my liabilities

I should therefore not spend above my capabilities

Pay off the debt required and then a little more

That way I can have, a great credit score

Like everything else, I must plan my finances

Create a budget and include my expenses

And make space for an emergency fund

So on rainy days I don't find myself cashless and hamstrung

Its important to remember that I won't work forever

I should therefore set something aside, to fall back on

When I'm too old and grey to embark on strenuous endeavor

I'll be well taken care of because I remembered my pension

And I shouldn't forget, to keep a proper record

Get educated in a financially sound method

That way I can know what comes in and what goes out

I'll be sure of my situation and leave room for no doubt

4 0
2 years ago
Babcock Company purchased a piece of machinery for $36,000 on January 1, 2019, and has been depreciating the machine using the s
pogonyaev

Answer:

<u>Requirement 1:</u>

Dr Accumulated Depreciation $9,600

Cr Retained Earnings  Account      $9,600

<u>Requirement 2:</u>

Dr Depreciation Expense $6,000

Cr Accumulated Depreciation $6,000

Explanation:

Year  Remaining Life of machine  Depreciation fraction

1                               5                                           5/15

2                              4                                           4/15

3                              3                                           3/15

4                              2                                           2/15

5                          <u>    1     </u>                                       1/15

Total                       15  

Now here, the depreciation formula is as under:

Depreciation expense = (Cost - Salvage Value) * Fraction value

<u>Year 2019:</u>

The sum of years digit fraction would be 5/15 and the cost of the machinery is $36,000. So

Depreciation Expense = ($36,000 - 0) * 5/15  = $12,000

<u>Year 2020:</u>

The sum of years digit fraction would be 5/15 and the cost of the machinery is $36,000. So

Depreciation Expense = ($36,000 - 0) * 4/15  = $9,600

<u>Year 2021:</u>

Now in this year the there is change in estimate and a switch in the use of the depreciation method, which is now straight line method. The change in estimate only includes the useful life of the asset which is 6 years from the date of purchase.

So for straight-line depreciation:

Depreciation Expense = (Cost - Salvage Value)  / Useful Life

By simply putting values, we have:

Depreciation Expense = $36,000 / 6 years = $6,000 per year

So this means, according to change in accounting policy, the excess depreciation charged must be eliminated from the previous years. The depreciation charge for the previous 2 years must be $12,000 and the excess depreciation charge is calculated as under:

Carrying value of the asset = $21,600 - $12,000  = $9,600

<u>Requirement 1:</u>

The double entry according to the US GAAP, for the excess depreciation charge in the previous years would be the waiving off of retained earnings with the excess depreciation amount calculated above.

Dr Accumulated Depreciation $9,600

Cr Retained Earnings  Account      $9,600

<u></u>

<u>Requirement 2:</u>

The depreciation expense for the year 2021, would be recorded as under:

Dr Depreciation Expense $6,000

Cr Accumulated Depreciation $6,000

3 0
3 years ago
If a firm is producing an output level for which marginal revenue is less than marginal cost;
sdas [7]

Answer:

The correct answer is option b.

Explanation:

A firm is able to maximize it's profit by producing output at the level where the marginal revenue earned from the last unit of output is equal to marginal cost incurred on it.

If a firm is operating at the point where the marginal revenue is lower than the marginal cost then the firm can maximize profit by reducing its output till the point where the marginal revenue and marginal cost are equal.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How should contact be established with a flight service station, and what service would be expected?
    10·1 answer
  • Which one of the following statements contains a metaphor
    13·2 answers
  • In monopoly how do you unmorgage a property
    15·1 answer
  • Research indicates that 17 percent of consumers recognize the Flatfeet brand of athletic wear. If there are 30,000 consumers in
    9·1 answer
  • During the year, Bonita Industries made an entry to write off a $33300 uncollectible account. Before this entry was made, the ba
    14·1 answer
  • Galen Company income under variable costing is $1,050,000. Fixed production costs in ending inventory are $300,000 and $250,000
    10·1 answer
  • Suppose that Portugal and Switzerland both produce fish and olives. Portugal's opportunity cost of producing a crate of olives i
    5·1 answer
  • Monthly production costs in Pesavento Company for two levels of production are as follows:Cost .............................2,00
    5·1 answer
  • Identify which statement is true of specialty products. Group of answer choices They are made directly available to a consumer t
    8·1 answer
  • ______ is a tool that reminds managers to look at several distinct categories in the macro environment.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!