1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bija089 [108]
3 years ago
6

What effect did the use of credit have on the economy in the 1920s? it made the economy stronger. it made the economy weaker. it

made parts of the economy stronger. it solved the problem of overproduction.
History
2 answers:
kumpel [21]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is: "it made the economy weaker".

The use of credit flourished in the so-called Roaring Twenties. This scenario allowed the economy to grow much further than what it would be possible considering the amount of resources in hands of the economic agents (households, firms and the public sector).

But this system was much riskier as, while it provided posibilities of high growth rates when the economic conditions were favourable, it led to disproportionate loses when the conditions turned bad.

Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer is B) it made the economy weaker.

<em>The effect that the use of credit had on the economy in the 1920s was that it made the economy weaker. </em>

What happened in the 1920s is not complicated to understand. Due to the prosperity in the economy, the so called “Roaring 20’s” consumerism was the constant in the country. Many people began to buy what did not needed but wanted. With the use of credit, families started to buy things for the house, personal care, and new things that were advertised. With credit, they had the opportunity to pay the bills every month. But the problem was that people started to buy things that later they were not capable of paying. Consumers bought a lot of things they could not afford. That is why consumers weakened the economy in the late 1920s.  

You might be interested in
The federalist favor the constitution as the basis of a new government because they
Gnom [1K]

they didnt like the idea of one man being in power they favored the people not the government

3 0
3 years ago
What was the Supreme Court case that legalized same sex relationships?
mamaluj [8]

Answer:

Explanation:

Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ˈoʊbərɡəfɛl/ OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The 5–4 ruling requires all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the Insular Areas to perform and recognize the marriages of same-sex couples on the same terms and conditions as the marriages of opposite-sex couples, with all the accompanying rights and responsibilities.[2][3]

Between January 2012 and February 2014, plaintiffs in Michigan, Ohio, Kentucky, and Tennessee filed federal district court cases that culminated in Obergefell v. Hodges. After all district courts ruled for the plaintiffs, the rulings were appealed to the Sixth Circuit. In November 2014, following a series of appeals court rulings that year from the Fourth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth Circuits that state-level bans on same-sex marriage were unconstitutional, the Sixth Circuit ruled that it was bound by Baker v. Nelson and found such bans to be constitutional.[4] This created a split between circuits and led to a Supreme Court review.

Decided on June 26, 2015, Obergefell overturned Baker and requires all states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed in other jurisdictions.[5] This established same-sex marriage throughout the United States and its territories. In a majority opinion authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, the Court examined the nature of fundamental rights guaranteed to all by the Constitution, the harm done to individuals by delaying the implementation of such rights while the democratic process plays out,[6] and the evolving understanding of discrimination and inequality that has developed greatly since Baker.[7]

Prior to Obergefell, same-sex marriage had already been established by law, court ruling, or voter initiative in thirty-six states, the District of Columbia, and Guam.[3]

7 0
3 years ago
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
Use defiant in a sentence
tankabanditka [31]
The girls father wanted to give her everything but she was always so defiant
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is NOT an accurate description for the Lost Generation, or those who reached adulthood at the end of WWI,
dedylja [7]

Answer:

Statement 1 and 4

Explanation:

In simple words, The Lost Generation refers to the cohort of social classes who aged in World War I. In this sense "Lost" relates to the "dazed, roaming, aimless" nature of several veterans of such conflict in the immediate interwar period.    

The community was "lost" throughout the context that such hereditary ideals weren't any longer important to the post - war period and due to its cultural isolation from either a U.S. wallowing under Pres.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did Sumerians built ziggurats ?
    12·2 answers
  • Before the Old Kingdom, which ruler unified Upper and Lower Egypt?
    10·2 answers
  • What did Spain lose at the end of the Spanish-American War?
    12·1 answer
  • What key factors played a role in the collapse of the Soviet Union? a) prices for goods dropped to an all time low b) many Sovie
    7·1 answer
  • What was the most important factor in explaining the Spanish victory over in case in the 16th century was the
    14·1 answer
  • How does historical causation differ from correlation?
    11·2 answers
  • What was the sentiment of U. S. citizens about involvement in the war?
    7·2 answers
  • 9. This Nubian kingdom was formed when the stronger villages overtook weaker ones.
    14·1 answer
  • How much power should the government have as it pertains to religious<br> freedom?
    15·1 answer
  • Which global event played a role in shaping the Declaration of Independence?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!