Since y=x-4 you would simply just plug that into 'y' on the other equation, given: x-4=3x+2.
Subtract x from both sides, it will leave you with -4=2x+2.
Next you would subtract 2 from both sides, leaving you with -6=2x.
All you need now is to get rid of the coefficient in front of 'x' so you divide both sides with 2, leaving you with your answer: -3=x.
Answer: -3=x
Hope this helps!
Answer:
The point that maximizes the objective function is (3,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
Constraints:

Using a graphing tool
The feasible region is the shaded area
see the attached figure
The vertices of the feasible region are
(0,0),(0,1),(1.5,1.5) and (3,0)
we know that
To find the point in the feasible region that maximizes the objective function, replace each ordered pair of vertices in the objective function and then compare the results.
The objective function is

For (0,0) -----> 
For (0,1) -----> 
For (1.5,1.5) -----> 
For (3,0) -----> 
therefore
The point that maximizes the objective function is (3,0)
● Answer:
6.25 km
● Step-by-step explanation:
Hi there !
4 cm ........... 5 km
5 cm ........... x km
x = 5cm×5km/4cm
= 25km/4
= 6.25 km
Good luck !
Answer:
34/8 would equal to 4 1/4 (simplified)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
15% of 40 is 6, add that up, its 46
Step-by-step explanation: