1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesantik [10]
3 years ago
14

The powers of the U.S. President were significantly limited by the decision in United States v. Nixon, in that it rejected which

of President Richard Nixon's
History
1 answer:
cluponka [151]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In the United States v. Nixon decision is  considered a crucial precedent limiting the power of any U.S. president to claim executive privilege.

Explanation:

The United States v. Nixon was an outcome of the watergate scandal. During the hearing of the case by the United States supreme court, the court outwardly rejected the "absolute, unqualified Presidential privilege of immunity from judicial process under all circumstances."

This limited the power of any president in domains of executive privilege.

<em>T</em>he executive privilege is the right of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch to conduct confidential communications such that they are resistant to the judicial

You might be interested in
1 Point
Rina8888 [55]
The correct answer is b
6 0
3 years ago
how did the appeasement of hitler lead to the blitzkrieg of Poland? What was the significance of the Poland attack?
Lubov Fominskaja [6]
Chamberlain's do nothing policy and make-nice attitude led to the invasion of both Czechoslovakia and also Poland. Hitler was emboldened to invade both countries when Neville Chamberlain came back from a meeting with Hitler and declared there would be 'Peace in our Time". He naively believed Hitler was not interested in conquest in Europe. Following the invasion of Poland, both France and the UK finally saw the truth of Hitler and declared war on Germany.

3 0
3 years ago
Which issue did all delegates agree with in the Constitutional Convention? how to count enslaved people for representation the n
Yuri [45]

Answer:

<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>

Explanation:

The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.

Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise

At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.

It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)

Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.

5 0
2 years ago
Which is a reason that individual historians organize history differently?
Marat540 [252]
Because they wanted a different way to show people o hope this helps you
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Astronomers have observed that the universe is expanding and is accelerating in all directions. Using this evidence, astronomers
tino4ka555 [31]
The answer is "theory". It's a possibility that's neither fact or opinion.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The success of the african-american civil rights movement of the 1950's and 60's had the greatest influence on which other ameri
    9·1 answer
  • Following the 4th century BC, what became the dominant language in the middle east?
    9·1 answer
  • 1. What is one reason many African nations were able to gain independence through largely peaceful means following World War II?
    10·1 answer
  • Which statement is true?
    7·2 answers
  • How does a School Identity<br> "Disruptive" Speech?
    13·1 answer
  • what restrictions does the fourth amendment place on government agents' searches of a person's "home, papers, or effects?"
    12·1 answer
  • What year did Christopher Columbus sail the oven blue?
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements is correct?
    6·2 answers
  • What Evidence shows that Lincoln was not the great Emancipator
    14·1 answer
  • 6. How did the United States plan on making communism unattractive in Europe?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!