1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Leya [2.2K]
4 years ago
14

Which rule explains why these triangles aren't congruent? see picture below.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Lisa [10]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

SSS

Step-by-step explanation:

Well, the picture says asks why the triangles are congruent but your question asks why they aren't congruent, so I will just assume that you made a typo, and you really meant: "Which rule explains why these triangles are congruent?"

Well, the triangles have two congruent sides, and they have a common shared side that are both congruent (due to reflexive property), so the triangle theorem SSS (Side-Side-Side) proves that the triangles are both congruent.

You might be interested in
The circle has a diameter of 16 inches. What is the area of the circle, rounded to the nearest square inch?
KATRIN_1 [288]

Answer:

201.1

Step-by-step explanation:

Hope it helps!!

6 0
4 years ago
Andre and scott share the driving on a trip. Scott drives 7 miles more than three times tge distance Andre drives. If the trip i
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

What we know is that A + S = 111. That is, the miles Andre drove plus the miles Scott drove totalled 111 miles. What we also know is that Scott drove quite a bit more than Andre did. Scott drove 7 miles more that ( +7 ) 3 times the number of miles Andrea drove. That looks like this algebraically:

S = 3A + 7

Now we can sub in that value for S to the original equation:

If A + S = 111 and S = 3A + 7, then

A + 3A + 7 = 111 and

4A + 7 = 111 and

4A = 104 so

A = 26 and

S = 3(26) + 7 so

S = 85 miles.

Scott drove 85 miles.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hhhhhheeeeelllllllllllppppppp now!!!!!
ryzh [129]

Answer:

C I’m not sure tho

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Please someone explain where does 2/3x and 1/6 come from
Iteru [2.4K]
4x + 1 = 6y

4x/6 + 1/6 = 6y/6

2x/3 + 1/6 = y.

4/6 is the same as 2/3 in lowest terms.








4 0
4 years ago
A marine biologist monitors the population of sunfish in a small lake. He records 800 sunfish in his first year, 600 sunfish in
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

Let's use the variable y to represent the number of years passed since the first year.

The population on the first year (y = 0) was 800

The population in the second year (y = 1) was 600.

The ratio in which the population decreased can be calculated as:

R = 600/800 = 0.75

This means that 600 is the 75% of 800, this also means that between the first year and the second year, the population decreased by the 25%

Now let's look at the ratio between the second and third year (y = 2), the population the third year was 450

Now the ratio is:

R = 450/600 = 0.75

Same as before, then we already can see that the population will decrease by 25% each year.

The generic exponential decay equation is:

f(y) = A*(1  - r)^y

where:

A = initial population, in this case, is 800

y = our variable, in this case, represents the number of years

r = the amount that decreases per each unit of our variable, this must be written in decimal form. In this case, we know that the population decreases by 25% each year, and 25% written in decimal form is 0.25

Also, (1 - r) = R, where R is the ratio we found earlier.

To do this, we just divide 25% by 100% to get (25%/100% = 0.25)

Then our equation will be:

f(y) = 800*(1 - 0.25)^y

f(y) = 800*( 0.75)^y

1) We want to predict when the population will be 200.

to do this, we set:

f(y) = 200 = 800*( 0.75)^y

and solve it for y.

(200/800) = 0.75^y

(1/4) = 0.75^y

Now we can use the relationship:

Ln(a^x) = x*ln(a)

Then let's apply Ln( ) in both sides to get

ln(1/4) = y*ln(0.75)

ln(1/4)/ln(0.75) = y = 4.8 years.

This means that 4.8 years after the first year, the population will be around 200.

2) The population in the 25 th year (this is 24 years after the first one, so we take y = 24) is:

f(24) = 800*(0.75)^(24) = 0.80

Around this point, we will have no more sunfish in the lake.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do u do this question:(
    8·2 answers
  • The equation ​ yˆ=−0.37x2+6.15x+52.3 ​ approximates the average temperature in October in degrees Fahrenheit at an agricultural
    10·2 answers
  • At the close of the stock market on Friday, the price of a stock dropped 3.75 points. Express this loss as a rational number in
    15·1 answer
  • What is the missing value to the nearest hundredth?
    9·2 answers
  • What is 1/2 of 1/3 of 1/5 of 60?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the slope of the line that passes through the points (3, -2) and (9, -2)?
    9·2 answers
  • WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!!
    10·1 answer
  • La división 3028÷25,el cociente es 605 y el residuo es 4 .¿Es cierto?​
    10·1 answer
  • Expand the function f(x)=(3x+2)^4
    15·1 answer
  • 9n - 7 = 5n - 19<br> What is n and why did you do that
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!