Human activities affect the operation of physical environment processes, and the results rebound on the human world. ... The physical environment provides resources and a platform to use those resources, but can also be a hazard to people. Therefore human impact as a subject is of special concern to physical geographers.
Hope this helps
I may be wrong but there is Buddhism, Taoism, <span>Confucianism those are all really big religions in china</span>
In general, the borders of the federal state of Washington are in accordance to natural physical features.
The border with Canada,, the northern one, is defined by the Okanogan Range and the Kettle Range, two highlands.
The border with Oregon, the southern one, is defined mostly with the Columbia River, and partially by the Blue Mountains.
The border with Idaho, the eastern one, is defined with the edge of the lowland part of the Columbia River Basin.
While the western border is a border with the open water of the Pacific Ocean.
Answer:
Humans using water to generate electricity does not negatively affect groundwater.
Explanation:
Rainwater, which is mostly fresh, drains into sewers most of the time of course. They are abundant in many towns, cities, etc. As a result, rainwater is not utilized enough, as it goes to waste when blending in with dirty sewer water. This leads to rainwater not draining into aquifers, And with the worlds population increased rapidly by the minute, consumption increases, leading to the water contained within aquifers to decrease in amount. Runoff from things such as pesticides and fertilizers is also a major issue that harms groundwater. As rain approaches, these chemicals can seep through dirt and soil, eventually going as far as to reach the groundwater underneath the surface, contaminating it. And humans utilizing water to generate electricity is more of a benefit to the environment. It is another effective way to get power, and is an alternative to fossil fuels. And using groundwater as a power source does not really affect the groundwater itself, so this is why the last option is correct.
Something must have been moving along and either plowed the stuff to one side or carried it and deposited it along the side. What else but a glacier?
PS. I'd guess this is more the province of geologists, not geographers