<span>What was Andreas Vesalius known for?
</span><span>d. the first accurate and detailed picture of human anatomy
</span>
He is also known as the founder of modern human anatomy.
Hope this helps.
The answer is c because having control over light in homes made a big difference. .
Answer:
The island the Pearl Harbor in on is Ford Island
Explanation:
It is known as source of information those documents that contain usefull data to satisfy a demand of knowledge or information. A very important part of the investigation process is to distinguish and select the sources more suitable for the work in progress.
In which matters to the question itself I believe that the sources you should avoid are those who could be subjective or express a single point of view like:
- Political sources focused on expressing a single point of view: This source is one to avoid because it doesn´t admit critics to the message and the idea it´s not open to debate.
- Commercial sources focused on selling a product: In this case you need to understand the prupose of the information provided by this sources. The objective of such sources is to sell not to inform so the facts wrote on it could be not quite academically right. Sources like this are known for the using of a lot of subjective adjectives.
The Government-sponsored websites and the subscription-based sources must have a deeper investigation to notice if they are objectives.
At last the acamedic sources that provide clear information are the ones you should use for a investigation work. They are objectives and made by professionals and pass through a very hard selection process made by colleagues and are the result of sometimes years of investigations.
I hope the answer help you and provides you what you were looking for. I give you a little explanation of what the sources of information are to put in context the answer.
I can't really see the answers you've provided if you did but, i wrote an essay kind of thing on captain thomas preston's account of the boston massacre here are some parts of it.
the source was created on 1770, considered a primary source, it was written because he wanted to prove his innocence to the jurors. the author's purpose was so because the daughters of the revolution wanted to re-open the case. according to his source the soldiers started the boston massacre they started to fire without order, and that the mob yelled fire, meaning an actual fire.
plus from what I've written, i personally believe the colonists started the boston massacre because, <span>as stated by Captain Thomas a
First-hand account, they started taunting them and throwing snowballs along
with other objects because they did not want the British regulars in their
town. The commending officer ordered his men to fix their bayonets and join the
guard outside the building which they were having a meeting in, after the
colonists attacked the soldiers one rifle shot into the crowd to the other
soldiers began firing moments later. Five colonists were dead three more were
injured while the british soldiers were put on trail only two were found guilty
of man slaughter and their thumbs were branded with an ‘M’ for murder as
punishment. I believe this could have been prevented if the soldiers were not
outside fixing their guns at that time. And had the British parliament had not
taken over american taxation measures in boston, the british should’ve stayed over in britian. </span>
