Answer:
10.20%
Explanation:
According to the Gordon constant growth model :
value = D1 / r - g
D1 = next dividend = $4.25
r = required return
g = growth rate = 3%
value = $59
$59 = $4.25 / r - 0.03
4.25 / 59 = r - 0.03
0.072034 = r - 0.03
r = 0.102034
r = 10.20%
The alpha of the stock is <u>6.6%</u>.
Alpha is also a degree of risk. With an alpha of - 15 means, the investment changed into far too risky given the go back. An alpha of 0 suggests that an asset has earned a return commensurate with the risk. Alpha of more than 0 means an investment outperformed, after adjusting for volatility. The process to calculate the alpha of the stock is: 0.12-[0.33+1.2(0.10+0.33)]= 0.066 = 0.066 * 100 = 6.6%
The expected return on monetary funding is the predicted fee of its return. it is a measure of the middle of the distribution of the random variable this is the return.
The risk-free rate is the rate of return offered by funding that consists of zero threat. Each investment asset contains a few levels of risk but is small, so the risk-free fee is something of a theoretical idea. In exercise, it is considered to be the interest rate paid on brief-term government debt.
Learn more about risk-free rates here brainly.com/question/19568670
#SPJ4
Answer:
$20,000
Explanation:
Calculation to determine by what amount will Perry's earnings increase due to this lease
Using this formula
Selling price=Fair value-Cost
Let plug in the formula
Selling price=$125,000-$105,000
Selling price=$20,000
Therefore The amount that Perry's earnings will increase due to this lease is $20,000
<span>Reject the null hypothesis since your F statistic is beyond the cutoff, and perform a post-hoc test to determine between which groups the significant difference occurs.</span>
The phenomenon experienced by the client when he believed that the performance appraisal was unfairly influenced by a drug error that the employee committed several weeks ago, is called the Horns Effect.
<h3>What is the Horns Effect?</h3>
The Horns Effect is a rater bias property in performance appraisal at workplace. It is a tendency for a single negative attribute to influence the rater to mark everything on the lower side of the scale. It is a bias that makes them think that one bad attribute seems to spoil the bunch.
It is the exact opposite of Halo Effect and makes decision making challenging. Horns Effect may lead to unfair sanctions or inappropriate dismissal of the employee.
To know more about Horns Effect, visit:
brainly.com/question/988504
#SPJ4