1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Yakvenalex [24]
3 years ago
11

How was the effect of imperialism on India similar to its effect on Haiti? A. Both countries emerged as major imperial powers. I

ndia established colonies in Spain, and Haiti established colonies in Japan. B. Both countries isolated themselves from their neighbors. India isolated itself from China, and Haiti isolated itself from Latin America. C. Both countries were colonized by European imperial powers. India was colonized by Great Britain, and Haiti was colonized by France. D. Both countries established commercial dominance. India commercially dominated Latin America, and Haiti commercially dominated Africa.
History
2 answers:
xz_007 [3.2K]3 years ago
8 0

The right option is C. The effect of imperialism on India was similar to its effect on Haiti due to the fact that both countries were colonized by European imperial powers. India was colonized by Great Britain, and Haiti was colonized by France.

Imperialism is a state government practice of expanding power and dominion, especially by direct territorial acquisition or by gaining economic and political control of other areas.

kkurt [141]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Both countries were colonized by European imperial powers. India was colonized by Great Britain and Haiti was colonized by France

Explanation:

APEX

You might be interested in
Why do you believe the Arab-Israeli conflict has persisted since 1948? Give me a paragraph
kogti [31]

The Arab-Israeli conflict has persisted since 1948, because, frankly, the Palestinians and many of the Arabian states fail to either accept or they break the treaties created by outside influences to help the situation in the area. The only two countries that have signed treaties with Israel is Egypt in 1979, and Jordan in 1994, with Egypt being the only country that really holds to their treaty.

Why would the Palestinians and Arabs continue to persist in their want of destruction for the Isreali country? After all, the Palestinian Covenant, formerly known as the Hamas Covenant, the ruling party and a terrorist organization, demands that they would not stop attacking Israel until it is utterly destroyed. When this is indoctrinated into the people, they fail to see their neighbor of Israel as human (see where this is going? World War II?), and continue their aggression in an effort to "take back their homeland", in which it wasn't even rightfully theirs, and to exterminate the Jews (which sounds a lot like the Nazi Doctrine during World War II). With this in mind, most of the countries and terrorist organizations would accept nothing less then the removal of the state of Israel, and the destruction of her people.

On top of that, there are many groups in the US who fails to see the conflict in it's light of truth. For example, the LGBTQ+++ community heavily condemns Israel (ironically), even though Israel is the only country in the Middle East to allow the LGBTQ+++ community to have a presence. Other countries, particularly European ones, also fail to see the benefits of having Israel in the Middle East as a safe haven for military actions in the area, and focus on feeding the Palestinians "tablespoons of power" by condemning Israel in U.N. meetings, much to no effect.

How should one go about to regaining peace in the area? Ironically, the way to maintain a fairly <em>uneasy</em> peace is to allow Israel to build up it's military forces and use a heavily dominate security force to secure her border. Even then, terrorist groups located in Palestinian lands cannot be reigned in by just a security force, and so the conflict would not truly end. Remember, on one side, they are asking for the destruction of a people group on all cost, while the other side is trying to defend herself.

Has the Arab-Isreali conflict persisted since 1948? It not only has persisted, but grew worse over time.

8 0
4 years ago
What was one way the New England Colonies differed from the Middle and Southern Colonies?
irakobra [83]

B. Agriculture was not a dominant part of the economy.

6 0
3 years ago
What was the biggest engineering project in American history?
SIZIF [17.4K]
Manhattan Project.......
4 0
3 years ago
1.
iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

1. Because it tells us about things that happen and some of them still happen..

2.it is necessary because in history we gain knowledge about the things that happened in the past past..

3. History is important because it teaches us about how life goes out there and it has lot of information about the past scandals

7 0
3 years ago
The Jay Treaty negotiated in 1794 caused
NeX [460]

On this day in 1795, President George Washington signs the Jay (or “Jay’s”) Treaty with Great Britain.

This treaty, known officially as the “Treaty of Amity Commerce and Navigation, between His Britannic Majesty; and The United States of America” attempted to diffuse the tensions between England and the United States that had risen to renewed heights since the end of the Revolutionary War. The U.S. government objected to English military posts along America’s northern and western borders and Britain’s violation of American neutrality in 1794 when the Royal Navy seized American ships in the West Indies during England’s war with France. The treaty, written and negotiated by Supreme Court Chief Justice (and Washington appointee) John Jay, was signed by Britain’s King George III on November 19, 1794 in London. However, after Jay returned home with news of the treaty’s signing, Washington, now in his second term, encountered fierce Congressional opposition to the treaty; by 1795, its ratification was uncertain.

Leading the opposition to the treaty were two future presidents: Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. At the time, Jefferson was in between political positions: he had just completed a term as Washington’s secretary of state from 1789 to 1793 and had not yet become John Adams’ vice president. Fellow Virginian James Madison was a member of the House of Representatives. Jefferson, Madison and other opponents feared the treaty gave too many concessions to the British. They argued that Jay’s negotiations actually weakened American trade rights and complained that it committed the U.S. to paying pre-revolutionary debts to English merchants. Washington himself was not completely satisfied with the treaty, but considered preventing another war with America’s former colonial master a priority.

Ultimately, the treaty was approved by Congress on August 14, 1795, with exactly the two-thirds majority it needed to pass; Washington signed the treaty four days later. Washington and Jay may have won the legislative battle and averted war temporarily, but the conflict at home highlighted a deepening division between those of different political ideologies in Washington, D.C. Jefferson and Madison mistrusted Washington’s attachment to maintaining friendly relations with England over revolutionary France, who would have welcomed the U.S. as a partner in an expanded war against England.

7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How much money did the United States lose in exports in the first year after Embargo act was passed?
    9·1 answer
  • How would you put this information on a white piece of paper and with the seal of Colorado on the same page, and still fit every
    6·1 answer
  • • New Zealand
    7·2 answers
  • why do you think Americans division over the issue of slavery led to the nation fighting civil war against itself ?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which event was most influential in turning American public opinion against Germany?
    8·2 answers
  • Which power does the Constitution specifically deny to the federal government?
    15·2 answers
  • Lambang senyawa dari monoksida adalah​
    13·1 answer
  • What was the standard issue rifle for the Japanese imperial army in WW2 ?
    7·1 answer
  • HELP...
    5·2 answers
  • What did the development of a national identity have in common in England and in Spain?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!