1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mylen [45]
3 years ago
15

Can you think of any problems that could come from using only 15 years of data to predict trends for the next 100 years? Explain

your answer. How could you prevent some of these problems?
Geography
1 answer:
pentagon [3]3 years ago
5 0

Explanation:

A major problem with using 15 years of data to predict 100 years of data is that the 15 years could have been setting a trend, then level off.

For example, if the 15 years of data was a graph, and it was going up every year, then what if 20 years into the 100 years it stops going up? Then that means the data was invalid because there wasn't enough to base any trends off of.

You can prevent this from happening by extending the collection time of data and to reduce the amount of time that the data will be used to predict.

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in
A satellite orbiting earth has a tangential velocity of 5000 m/s. earth’s mass is kg and its radius is m. which is the distance
inessss [21]

The distance of the satellite form the earth is:
9,608,000 m (Option C) in Standard form, this is written as 9.6 x 10^{6}.

<h3>What is an Orbiting Satellite?</h3>

An Orbiting Satellite is a satellite that goes around the earth in an elliptical path known as an orbit.

To calculate the distance of the satellite from the earth we must equalize the force of Gravity to Centripetal Force given that these are the two forces that are at play here.

Step 1:

Equation that equalizes Gravity to Centripetality is:

G = mM/r² = m(v²/r)

Note that G = 6.67 x 10^{-11} (This is a gravitational constant.)

m is the Mass of the Satellite

M is Mass of the Earth

r is the distance of the satellite from the center of the earth

v is the satellites tangential velocity

Step 2 - Rearrange the formula and substitute the numbers above to get r

r = G (m/v²) = (6.67 x 10^{-11}) (6 x10^{24}/5000²) =

= 1.6 x 10^{7}m

Recall that form our postulation above, this is the satellites distance form the center of the earth.

To get it's distance form the earth's surface, we must know remove the value of the radius of the earth from the calculation. Where radius of the earth is given a r'

Hence,

r' = r - R = 1.6 x 10^{7}m - 6.4 x 10^{6}m

= 9.6 x 10^{6}m or 9,608,000 m

Learn more about orbiting satellites at:

brainly.com/question/18496962

3 0
2 years ago
Answer the following questions concerning the motion of surface winds in the Northern hemisphere on Earth due to the uneven heat
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

Explanation:

the motion of surface winds in the Northern hemisphere on Earth due to the uneven heating of the atmosphere and Coriolis force. Due to the Earth's rotation, surface winds have different speeds at different latitudes as follows:

Surface winds travel faster closer to the equator (0 degrees latitude).

Surface winds travel slower closer to the North pole (90 degrees latitude).

3 0
3 years ago
Hi! I was wondering, If half the world is on fire, and you only have one way out, would you:
umka21 [38]
1. Flee, taking exerting
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are some pros and cons of attempting to forecast earthquakes/volcanoes?
sineoko [7]
Well first, cons

1.) We can't forecast the timing, so that's a biggie. The prospects of forecasting the timing for earthquakes is quite dim at the moment and not in the foreseable future.
2.)Unless you predict earthquakes 100% of the time then improper forecasting can actually result in fatalities and lifeloss.
3.)If we could predict earthquakes, there would be some huge societal implications. For instance Hurricane Katrina was predicted several days out but that didn't result in a wholly successful evacuation of New Orleans which was biased against the poor.
4.)Accurate forecasting would not change the need for preparedness and good building codes. The ground is still going to shake, buildings still need to resist lateral seismic forces, people still need to be prepared for not having gas, water, telecom, electricity, for a certain amount of time.

And pros,

It would relieve some peoples anxiety about "when the big one" is going to hit. But then that would turn into "how big is the big one" anxiety.

The questions you ask can be considered similar to "what are the pros and cons of forecasting when each of us will die". It doesn't change the fact, just what and how we worry about it.
6 0
4 years ago
<img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Chuge%7B%5Cmathfrak%7B%5Cpurple%7Bdefine%20%5C%3A%20climate%7D%7D%7D" id="TexFormula1" title
shtirl [24]

Climate is the average weather in a place over many years. It mainly describes the weather.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following is not an effect of urban sprawi?
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the phrases describes a result of the greenhouse effect?
    13·2 answers
  • Use the drop-down menus to identify the type of mass movement in each image.
    15·2 answers
  • What are examples of how cultural geography may have affected the Great Migration in the US?
    14·1 answer
  • The diagram below shows the movement of Earth plates.
    15·1 answer
  • How do people Tavel in the Savanna?
    5·1 answer
  • Which resource is renewable?
    12·2 answers
  • what advice will you give to three people running a private limited company the extent to which their liability will be limited​
    5·1 answer
  • Need Help!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • 19. Which mountain is found in North America?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!