If we hope to bring about significant changes within individuals and communities, we:
need to change conditions that affect people rather than merely changing people who are affected by these conditions
In this way, we may succeed in promoting the welfare of clients and the hope to bring about significant changes may be possible.
Answer:
1 c) The great wall and the grand canal
2c) silk Material
3d)wheel barrow, boat rudder, matches , and acupuncture
Answer:
This is likely an example of a referential delusion.
Explanation:
Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized primarily by its hallucinations and delusions.
- Hallucinations are <em>distorted perceptions of reality</em>, which are perceived thanks to the senses, such as <em>auditory or visual</em> hallucinations, for example.
- Delusions are fake beliefs the individual has.
In this case, Sally believes there's a special meaning for her in a billboard. This is known as a referential delusion, which is characterized by an individual believing that something from the environment is directed specifically for them, such as seeing hidden messages in the television, for example.
Family preservation is a strategy to lessen the number of kids taken from their families and placed in foster care that has received fervent support and is now the most popular service.
<h3>What will serve as the main yardstick by which the success of family preservation will be evaluated?</h3>
Improvements in family functioning and improvements in child functioning are two criteria that could be used to gauge the success of a child welfare policy.
<h3>What elements go into taking a child out of a home?</h3>
A youngster does not receive enough food, a place to live, clothing, or medical attention. A young youngster is experiencing serious emotional harm. Due to a parent, guardian, or other household member's negligence, cruelty, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse, or medical neglect, the home of a kid is dangerous.
To Know more about Family preservation
brainly.com/question/23271626
#SPJ4
Answer:
law of effect
Explanation:
Thorndike referred to this as the law of effect. In simple terms, Thorndike explains that if a certain stimulus/behavior has a favorable consequence, the subject will want to repeat this behavior. If it continues to have a favorable consequence then the subject will continue to repeat this behavior until it becomes a continuous pattern. The opposite applies to behaviors that have unfavorable consequences, the subject in question will associate the unfavorable consequence with the behavior and cease performing the behavior. The worse the consequence, the faster the subject will stop the behavior.