Answer:
No. In an 8-1 decision authored by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, the Court concluded that the relevant sections of the Enforcement Act lacked the necessary, limiting language to qualify as enforcement of the Fifteenth Amendment. The Chief Justice first stated that the Fifteenth Amendment "does not confer the right of suffrage upon any one," but "prevents the States, or the United States, however, from giving preference…to one citizen of the United States over another on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." In examining the language of the Enforcement Act, the Court noted that, while the first two sections of the act explicitly referred to race in criminalizing interference with the right to vote, the relevant third and fourth sections refer only to the "aforesaid" offense. According to the Court, this language does not sufficiently tailor the law to qualify as "appropriate legislation" under the Enforcement Clause of the Fifteenth Amendment.
Explanation:
Answer:
Thomas L. Friedman
Explanation:
Thomas L. Friedman is author and political commentator from USA. He has won the Pulitzer price thrice and writes weekly columns for The New York Times. He has also written ob Global trade, environmental issues an globalisation.
He is often criticised for his support of Saudi Royal Prince Mohammed bin Salman , unregulated trade and Iraq war.
whoo? can you pls say who ?
