Answer:
It depends upon how the data were collected and assessed
Explanation:
Science may be defined as the systematic study or analysis of the natural world made through experiment and observation. While pseudoscience may be defined as the belief, claim or the practice that may be presented as scientific, but it does not follow any scientific technique or method.
In the context, evidence was collected by the website Olympic Project for the Bigfoot depends on how these data were assessed and collected to be recognized as science or pseudoscience.
You can easily write about the history and how tax reform started and the meaning and purpose of it. i feel like that is a good way to approach a speech if it’s meant to be informative about the topic. a lot of people know what is going on with the legislature in today’s day but do not agree with it. explaining the benefits or the negatives could be a good outlook too. form your own opinion on it and then back that up with evidence! so like research and statistics. hope that helps.
A survey would be reliable if it had the same results, because then it would have been proven time and time again that it is credible. It is valid when it measures to what it intends to measure, because if it didn't, how would it be valid? In order for it to be valid, it has to make sense and measure what it intends to measure. The answer is D: reliable; valid.
<span>Based on a "variable-interval schedule".</span>
A variable interval schedule<span> refers to
a sort of operant conditioning reinforcement schedule</span> in the process
support is given to a reaction after particular measure of time has passed, the
amount of time which is not predictable, yet this measure of time is on a changing/variable
schedule.
