Answer:
The first reason why people are willing to pay so much less or lower than the expected value is due to the uncertainty of flipping a heads. Heads may never be flipped.
The Second reason they are willing to pay so much less or lower is because the expected value will rarely reach over $10 because player would have to make it to the 5th flip in order to recoup their investment in which most of the players are unwilling and ready to take that risk.
Explanation:
Saint Petersburg Gambles
The first reason why people are willing to pay so much less or lower than the expected value is due to the uncertainty of flipping a heads. Heads may never be flipped.
The Second reason they are willing to pay so much less or lower is because the expected value will rarely reach over $10 because player would have to make it to the 5th flip in order to recoup their investment in which most of the players are unwilling and ready to take that risk.
This is known as the coattail effect. It is when the actions or activities of the main branch of a business or the franchise branches would impact the whole business. This is one weakness of a franchise business. since one wrong move from just one small branch would might have a larger impact on the whole name of business.<span />
Answer:
The WACC before bond issuance is 3.9% and the WACC after bond issuance is 3.71%
Explanation:
In order to calculate the WACC before bond issuance
, we would have to calculate first the cost of equity using capital asset pricing model
.
So Using CAPM we have Rf + Beta x Market risk premium
=
0.5% + 0.85 * 4%
= 3.9%
. cost of equity
Therefore WACC before bond issuance = (Cost of equity x weight of equity + cost of debt (1-tax) x weight of debt)
= 3.9%
. WACC before bond issuance will be equal to cost of equity in this case as there is no debt issue.
In order to calculate the WACC after bond issuance we make the following calculation:
WACC after bond issuance = (Cost of equity x weight of equity + cost of debt (1-tax) x weight of debt)
= (3.9% x 0.9) + (2% x 0.1)
= 3.51% + 0.2%
= 3.71%
Answer:
$57500 to Zheng and $ 47500 to Murray
Explanation:
Allocation of Net income Zheng Murray Total
Total Net income 105000
Less: Salary allowance 60000 40000 -100000
Remaining income 5000
Less: Interest on capital 10% 10000 20000 - 30000
Remaining Loss -25000
Share equally -12500 -12500 25000
Share of partners 57500 47500 0
The dollar buys more yen<span> and the </span>dollar has<span> appreciated.</span>
