The answer is Withdrawing management style
Withdrawing management style refers to a style of conflict resolution in which the person choose to pretending that there is nothing wrong in every conflicts.
This type of management style is the least suitable style for leadership and tend to cause negative disorders in personal life.
Based on historical context, the statement about anthropologists studying sexuality as features of anthropology before World War II are the following:
- Human sexuality was considered to be a fundamental aspect of the culture and was included in various customs.
- Anthropologists like Margaret Mead researched sexuality among young people in the western Pacific.
However, the statement about Anthropologists studying sexuality as a feature of anthropology after World War II is the following:
- Anthropologists no longer focused on sexuality customs that centers on marriage, relatives, and family.
- Anthropologists started researching sexuality issues such as gay, lesbian, and queer life, etc.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that anthropologists studied different characteristics of sexuality before and after World War II.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/1799013
Most of the work in considering and editing bills is done in A) congressional committees. These congressional committees are the first stop after a bill is introduced by a Congress member and is where most of the editing and adjustment takes place before a bill with either move on or be killed.
Answer: A glacier's weight, combined with its gradual movement, can drastically reshape the landscape over hundreds or even thousands of years.
Explanation:
The ice erodes the land surface and carries the broken rocks and soil debris far from their original places, resulting in some interesting glacial landforms.
Answer:
It is not reasonable to say there is a correlation because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be athird variable (lurking variable) that may have a better explanation for the correlation.
Explanation:
Is it not reasonable to say that there's a correlation between the type of car you own and the risk that it will be stolen because it is categorical data. However if it was quantitative data, correlation doesn’t always mean causation, because there might be a third variable that may have a better explanation for the correlation and it might as well means that the third-lurking variable affects the correlation; for example, those cars that are most frequently reported stolen may simply be the cars that are more commonly sold because they are cheaper than the cars that are stolen least often, and thus have a higher chance of being exposed to thieves.
