The correct option is B
<u>Explanation:</u>
In an economy, planned investment spending is always equal to planned saving. If actual saving falls short of (exceeds) planned saving, then actual investment falls short of (exceeds) planned investment.
That is the other part of the saving paradox. If an economy produces too much, such that saving is greater than planned investment, inventory will build up, giving signal to producers to reduce output, to restore equilibrium. Such investment scheme is suitable only to communist countries. Keynes has another investment theory in his liquidity story. But investment theories are equally a posterior.
Therefore, Option B is correct
Answer:
I have 3 statements
Explanation:
The characteristics of oral narrations are as follows.
1) They can be real or imaginary.
2) They are structured in dialogue, monolog and paragraph.
3) It is written in past tense
Hope it helped u if yes mark me BRAINLIEST!
Tysm!
Answer:
Future value (FV) = $57,908
Present value (PV) = $8,860
Number of years (n) = 18 years
Interest rate = ?
FV = PV(1 + r)n
$57,908 = $8,860(1 + r)18
$57,908 = $8,860(1 + r)18
<u>$57,908</u> = (1 + r)18
$8,860
6.535891648 = (1 + r)18
18√6.535891648 = 1 + r
1.10993 - 1 = r
r = 0.10992 = 10.99%
Explanation:
In this case, we will apply the future value of a lump sum (single investment) formula. The present value, future value and number of years are given with the exception of interest rate. Thus, interest rate is made the subject of the formula.
Answer: You need to subtract the following then add what you have left.
Explanation: For example if you had $300 and you spent 200 you have $100 left
There are several first mover advantages including:
-Brand recognition: better chance of being recognized if you were the first to do something
- Economies of Scale: learn how to perfect and grown in the market before other competitors come along
-Switching costs: when customers are established with the first brand they are less likely to want to spend the money to switch to a new competitor