Answer:
Limited Government
Explanation:
It would limited government because it would be the federal government forcing the citizens to do something that the government does not have the ability to do (hence them being limited) and sense the people are above all else in the constitution(aka the most powerful political entity) it would not only violate their rights but violate the limits put in place on the government such as that big one that the government cant violate a persons rights without do process or valid legal reasons and a warrant.
Could i get brainliest answer? i only need 4 more to get virtuous status and if you are familiar with brainly its a pretty big deal for me. Could you help a friendly stranger out friendly stranger?
Hope that this helped, have a great day! :D
The statement "Kersaint owned plantations and other property in the French Caribbean"does not called for an immediate abolition of slavery.
<h3>Who is
Armand-Guy Kersaint?</h3>
He was a sailor and politician who held an important naval posts during the early stages of the French Revolution.
Hence, the true statements about Armand-Guy Kersaint during the Napoleon French includes:
- he advocates for encouraging the willing migration of Africans to French colonies rather than their enslavement.
- he had participated in military campaigns against the British in the Caribbean and during the American Revolution.
- he called for abolishing the traditional privileges of the French nobility in France and its colonies.
Therefore, the Option D is correct.
Read more about Napoleon French
<em>brainly.com/question/361806</em>
This depends on ones interpretation. Our government has set up a system of checks and balances, each branch can override another.There are three branches <span>of government: executive, legislative, and judicial.The legislature enacts</span>
Try google says he is a worl singer
