Answer:
Cost of capital=11.18%
Explanation:
First We will calculate the Equity of firm:
Equity= Number of share* Book value per share
Equity= 10,000* $25
Equity= $250,000
Long-term debt=$300,000
Expected rate of return=15%=0.15
Current yield to maturity (rdebt)=8%=0.08.
Value of firm=Equity+Long-term debt
Value of firm= $250,000+$300,000
Value of firm= $550,000
Formula:
Cost of capital=11.18%
Answer:
C. Underwriting experience.
Explanation:
Underwriters are known as evaluators in cases especially like that of mortgage etc, accessing the amount of risk that will involved in taking certain amount of loans. Therefore generally speaking, underwriting is simply explained as method through which an institution takes on financial risk for a fee. Risk of these such are mostly explained to be typically having dealings with loans, insurance, or investments. Certain contingencies are seen to helps to maintain certain borrowing policies for loans, establishes appropriate premiums to adequately cover the true cost of insuring policyholders, and creates a market for securities by accurately pricing investment risk.
Answer:
$570
Explanation:
The computation of the interest deduction is shown below:
= Interest paid × number of months ÷ (total number of months in a year)
= $3,420 × 2 months ÷ 12 months
= $570
The interest which is deducted in year 0 under the cash method of accounting is $570
And, the two months is calculated from the November 1 to December 31
We simply apply the interest paid formula.
Marginal utility is the <u>"change in total utility obtained by consuming one more unit of a good".</u>
Marginal utility evaluates the additional satisfaction a customer earns from consuming extra units of products or services. The idea of marginal utility is utilized by economists to decide the amount of a thing buyers are happy to buy. Positive peripheral utility happens when the utilization of an extra thing builds the total utility, while negative marginal utility occurs when the utilization of an extra thing diminishes the total utility.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
