Answer:
A. Give the subject comprehensive information about the new drug, including its side effects. Discuss the pros and cons of both the investigational drug and the commercially available drug and then allow the subject to decide whether to withdraw from the research to take the new drug.
Explanation:
In the medical sector, the right of an individual is highly sort after before an decision is taken regarding to the patient's health. For example, a patient decision would be required before an operation is carried out on him irrespective of the critical state of the medical issue.
In the case of the 46-year-old man, it is the right of the man to take the decision whether to withdraw from the research drugs and embark on the commercially available treatment drug.
What the doctor (investigator ) can only be able to do is to offer all informations regarding to the new treatment drugs that would allow the patient make informed decision.
The answer to this is letter "B".
The answer to this question is <span>Hedonistic calculous
An example of jeremy bentham's approach would be in the case of robbery.
Most members of the society see robbery as 'immorals' because they felt 'negative' results if that action happen to them, so they judge it as morally wrong. This sense of morality certainly wouldn't be applied in action that give 'positive result', such as working out for example</span>
<span>Speaker of the House is the answer you're looking for. Hope I helped!</span>
This example highlights the role of "uncontrollability"<span> in coping.
</span>
The state of mind towards data concerning the distressing occasion is thought to be the essential property of the individual adapting style. Of the situational factors, controllability is viewed as a variable of unique significance for adapting conduct, in light of the fact that in controllable circumstances data handling concerning the stressor is versatile, while in wild circumstances it has a little esteem.
