What document and what did you put for part A?
Answer:
On the one hand, the moral of The Bundle of Sticks, reflects on the idea that "union makes strength": when each of the sons tried to break the entire bundle of sticks, no one was able to do it. Therefore, the dying father tells them: "untie the bundle and each of you take a stick", so the sons were finally able to break the sticks, by breaking them individually, but in the end, through the union of the brother's forces, altogether.
On the other hand, the moral of "Hofus the stonecutter", refers to how people unecessarily want to be superior in hierarchy in society. The tale shows how a stonecutter always wishes to become someone or something superior than him, for instance, when he sees that the cloud is stronger than the sun (when he was the sun), so he wishes to be "the storm". But in the end, he realizes the stonecutter was the strongest of all.
Explanation:
hmu if yah need more help! :)
The story "Civil Peace" by Chinua Achebe follows a character called Jonathan Iwegbu in the aftermath of the Nigerian Civil War. The civil war was extremely disruptive and destructive, and Jonathan has lost almost everything he had. However, the aftermath of the war is not much better. Violence, crime and suffering are still rampant, and it is obvious that things will not be back to normal for a very long time.
The title "Civil Peace" is therefore used in an ironic sense. Achebe wants us to remember that, even though technically peace has been restored, the situation is still far from normal. Moreover, the violence that was common during the war is not gone, and things are still not much better for common people like Jonathan Iwegbu.
Answer:
joining them in a marriage
Explanation:
I found the analysis online but I want to remind you to rewrite it properly. If you do not want to be caught, check what the writers from Prime Writing can do for you.
In the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr., he writes to defend himself against the clergymen’s accusations in which he explains his motive on his civil rights demonstrations and strives to justify the desperate needs for nonviolent action in the Civil Rights Movement. His primary audience throughout the letter was to the religious leaders as he was responding to an open letter for criticism, whereas the secondary audiences are white moderates and the religious population. Dr King’s letter addresses that the white attitudes towards African Americans and the Civil Rights Movements in the 1960s were hostile as they were unable to accept the movement, especially in the South. Throughout the letter, he uses various literary and rhetorical devices to justify his actions and show why they aren't illegal.
