I believe the answer is D: Early followers had different opinions about who would lead them.
After the death of Prophet Muhammad, nobody knew who would lead them again, and the religion split apart into two due to this.
According to npr, most of the Prophet Muhammad's followers wanted the community of Muslims to determine who would succeed him; a smaller group thought that someone from his family should take up his mantle.
<em>If this is incorrect, please, don't refrain to tell me. Thank you. </em>
What we are looking for is the confidence interval.
Given:
Sample it is denoted by n = 10
Mean = 80
Standard deviation = 12
Confidence Interval = 99%
Now compute for the margin of error, the formula is Za/2 * σ/√(n)
A 99% level of confidence has a critical value of zα/2 = 2.58.
The standard error is σ/√(n) = 3.162
Multiply 2.58 by 3.162 = 9.8 is the margin of error.
The formula for confidence interval is x̅ ± Za/2 * σ/√(n)
= 80 ± 9.8
= 70.2 < x< 89.8
Answer:
Answers: one; another. This is an important distinction. Different governments have a different reason to tackle the same public problem.
Explanation:
Even though the problem could be the same, the governments usually respond to their citizens believes, cultural traditions and history and every case are unique. Therefore the WHY consider different reasons. The HOW is more related to available resources and capabilities. Different governments have different stock of resources and skills to tackle the same public problem, therefore, the implemented solution could have unique traits. As a summary, WHY are linked to citizen preferences, cultural traditions or history, and HOW are related to available resources and capabilities
<span>Moral Motivation.</span>
In our regular day to day existences, we stand up to a large
group of good issues. Once we have deliberated and formed judgments about what
is right or wrong, good or bad, these judgments tend to have a marked hold on us. In spite
of the fact that at last, we don't generally carry on as we think we should,
our ethical judgments ordinarily inspire us. Moral motivation is an instance of
a more general phenomenon—what we might call normative
motivation—for our other normative judgments also typically have some
motivating force.