The statements referred by the question are:
a) It convinced the United States to dismantle its nuclear weapons.
b) It proved that a naval blockade was not an act of war.
c) It showed Cuba that communism should be stopped.
d) It brought the world dangerously close to nuclear war.
The correct statement is D. Historians agree the Missile Crisis was the closest the world got to have a nuclear war between the U.S. and USSR. Nothing before or after this came as close to be direct aggression from one of these countries against the other.
Statements A and C never happened: the U.S. has nuclear weapons until today, and Cuba didn't give up on communism.
Statement B doesn't fit the facts around the Missile Crisis. The naval blockade didn't lead to war only because the U.S. was defensive.
Well they should and shouldn't
.im saying this because if they only prioritize on doing environmental things then that new country will fail almost immediately.due to not having a stable government which will intern cause it to be like an every man for them self's type of situation.
But on the other hand if they dont only go after there government issues then there natural resources will run out causing starvation,low birth and death rate,etc. intern causing in a short amount of time it to become like a third world country and be barely scrapping bye.
hope this was what your question is looking for and its helps u in multiple ways! .^_^.
-Harley <3
Your answer is C. You share risks with others.
It was issued January 1st 1863
He was commander in chief of the U.S armed forces
