Answer:
7 to 3 is this answer
Step-by-step explanation:
if you noticed, with all the other ones they all have 3 : 7 in it. So by the process of elimination it's 7 to 3 that is different. I'll tell you why,
3 : 7, that is the ratio we have as an example. That's why it isn't the different one.
3 to 7, you say 3 : 7 as 3 to 7 to it still has the same ratio
3/7, this is how to type the fraction version of the ratio so it makes sense that it is the same one as 3 : 7.
7 to 3, if you haven't noticed yet, all of them has 3 : 7 as a counterpart. They are all the same but this one, this is 7 : 3 or 7 to 3. So with logic, this is the different ratio.
Answer:- A.The independent variable is the input variable and should be represented by the x-axis.
Explanation:-
A. Correct.
B. Not correct.
<u>Reason</u>:- The independent variable is the input variable and should be represented by the x-axis.
C. Not correct.
<u>Reason</u>:- The dependent variable is the output variable and should be represented by y-axis.
D. Not correct.
<u>Reason</u>:-The dependent variable is the output variable and should be represented by y-axis.
Answer:
974
Step-by-step explanation:
(91.01)*(10.7)
91.01*(10.7)
91.01*10.7
973.80700
974
Answer:
The answer is 105.
Step-by-step explanation: