The statement which best articulates a non interventionist argument against American imperialism is ''American expansion exploits the people’s of other nations''
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The American rule over the other countries through ways like trade, religion or may be with the use of military forces was not liked by the people of those countries because it led to the deterioration of those economies and the exploitation of people of those countries.
Therefore people of those countries did not like it because it led to the exploitation of their resources, economy, financially and there was too much interference in the working of the government of those countries also.
In battleground states, they will be more competitive. therefore, people of both parties will feel inclined to run and parties will put more money into flipping them or winning campaigns to show their strength.
Answer:
Explanation:
Amendment XIV (14) was passed to keep a particular group of people from holding a Federal office. What specific group of people was the 3rd section of the 14th amendment passed so that it could keep them from holding office? What was the exception to this basic rule.
Answer:
I believe the answer is A. Labor Strike
Explanation:
Hope this helps.
Answer:
The move to Avignon gave more power to the French Kingdom, at the expense of the Italian city-states, and especially, of the Papal States.
Explanation:
Because the Papal states were the Italian territories that were under direct control of the Church, when the Pope moved to Avignon, he annexed the city to the Papal States, so technically it was part of them. However, in practice, the pope was mostly influenced by French nobles, and had little power over the Italian papal states.
This was an opportunity for the Italian nobles of the region, who seized more power and control over the area.
