I’m in secondary school but the method you should use is step by step lol. I’m in year 9
Suppose an unexpected freeze in Florida destroys 20% of the Florida orange crop.-This results in the shift of the supply curve to the left resulting in an increase in the prices.
Explanation:
Suppose an unexpected freeze in Florida destroys 20% of the Florida orange crop.
a) What are the likely effects of the crop damage on Florida orange prices and output levels?
As a consequence of the unexpected freeze in Florida , the orange crops will get damaged. This will result in a decline in the supply of oranges in the market. Which will lead to a shift in the supply curve of orange to the left, resulting in an increase in the price of oranges, and a decline in its output level or the quantity sold/supplied in the market
b) How will the freeze affect the equilibrium price of California oranges
Due to the unexpected freeze the supply curve of the California oranges will shift to the left,which will result in an increase in the price of the California oranges(In this case the quantity demanded is more than the quantity supplied/sold)
<span>B. focus on their on the speaker.</span>
Answer:
$73,500
Explanation:
The computation of the absorption costing net operating income last year is shown below:
= Variable costing net operating income - inventory units × Fixed manufacturing overhead cost per unit
= $81,900 - 2,800 units × $3
= $81,900 - $8,400
= $73,500
We simply deduct the fixed manufacturing overhead cost from the variable costing net operating income to find out the absorption costing net operating income
Explanation:
In my opinion, the use of focal point reviews is more advantageous for an organization than the anniversary model for employee performance evaluations, since in the anniversary evaluation there is an annual performance evaluation, carried out on the employee's hiring date or at the end of the year, this model may be more complex due to the difficulty of organizing the evaluation of all employees, since there are different dates for hiring employees, which can mean a problem with the agenda that interferes with the evaluation.
Focal point reviews, on the other hand, are more advantageous because they can be carried out whenever there is an identification of reduced performance of employees, and allow managers to carry out integrated performance evaluations, which gives the advantage of eliminating some type of bias that compromises the fairness of the assessment. In the focal point reviews, there is an employee evaluation based on comparisons between employee performance, which ensures greater efficiency in evaluating and developing actions to improve employee performance.