Answer:
hearsay
Explanation:
According to my research on federal law investigations, I can say that based on the information provided within the question most federal courts assume that the records contain hearsay. This term means that the evidence contains unofficial information acquired from another and not part someone's direct knowledge. This is usually inadmissible in court unless proven that it was obtained legally.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The answer is “both, the baseball coach and Mr. Henry”.
In fact both of these meaning Mr. Henry and the baseball coach have violated and wronged on the grounds that baseball coach wrongly approached and persuaded Mr. Henry to change the grade of student and Mr. Henry accepted that and went on with changing the grades. The state board of educator certification can take action against both.
It was Lev V<span>ygotsky, a Soviet psychologist, who theorized about the aided and the preceded concepts regarding the development of language. His theory was mainly focused on human bio-social and cultural development and for him interaction is a necessary tool in one's development.</span>
As a judge, i would rule in favor if Bakilana
By confiscating her password and forcing her to work for long hours, Bakilana had cause intentional infliction of emotional distress toward kiwanuka.
Bakilana has intentionally inflicted emotional distress to Kiwanuka by taking extreme/outrageous conduct such as taking her passwords and mentally abuse Kiwanuka.
But, that's being said, Kiwanuka does not present any proof about her accusation. (recording or witnesses). If Kiwanuka provide them, as a judge I will rule in favour of her. But since there is still a reasonable doubt that the accusation is false, i would rule in favor of Bakilana.
Social Darwinists still believe the survival of the fittest.
So they believe the one that stuck in poverty are the one that is not fit well within the society
hope this helps
