This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
Answer:
An appeal is a request for a higher court to review a lower court's decision.
Explanation:
In law, an appeal is the process in which cases are reviewed by a higher authority, where parties request a formal change to an official decision. Appeals function both as a process for error correction as well as a process of clarifying and interpreting law.[1] Although appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law countries did not incorporate an affirmative right to appeal into their jurisprudence until the 19th century
The gift of smell is the first one. Its useful to his clan because he can tell if food is safe or not.
A trash man.
A sous chef oversees the chef job if he is absent
Remys coworker eats the soup
They thought it was delicious
The person might choose to put a review online
I believe that statement is False
Collectivities refers to a group of people that decided to banded up together in pursuit of a common goal.
Even though it's true that their relationship tend to be direct, but most of the time the relationship only lasted for a short period of time, and the group would be disbanded as soon as the goal is accomplished.
I believe the answer is: <span> free trade area
</span><span> free trade area refers to a region where all members of a certain organization could trade their resources with significantly lower barriers.
</span>This would allow those who trades in the region to obtain more profit from the lower taxation rate.