If Mathilde Loisel did not lose the necklace nothing would have changed for her. She would have gone on being poor and miserable, longing for more.
Pamphlets like Common Sense and The Crisis #1 were published with the intention of influencing public opinion in favor of the very divisive cause of American independence from the British Crown. thus option B is correct.
<h3>What is the Thomas Paine crisis' major argument?</h3>
The colonists are urged by Paine to place a high value on victory and the freedom that follows because "the harder the battle, the more wonderful the triumph"—"what we gain too cheap, we esteem too cheaply," he observes, and "it is dearness only that gives everything its value." No. 1 crisis
It is crucial to keep in mind that many residents of the American colonies believed themselves to be primarily British.
Declaring the necessity for independence was viewed by many in the Colonies as treason. These pamphlets contributed to the debate and persuaded people of something that had previously been unheard of. A PR effort was required to increase American support for the revolution.
Learn more about pamphlets and articles here:
brainly.com/question/5953344
#SPJ1
The answer is the second option: It’s difficult to predict the effects of new policies and procedures.
Some (not all) men are against shifting gender roles because, historically and presently the nature of gender roles typically put males at a societal advantage. So the concept of having shifts in these gender roles, means that many males are often nervous that they will lose the stability in the systematic designation of societal standing due to gender, that was always designed to favour them. Although these fears are irrational, as most of the modern movements in relation to gender roles are in favour of freedom of the individual, and not intended to put any group or person at a disadvantage.
