The future value of the annual amounts after six years, earning an annual rate of return of 3% is $517.47
What is the future value of an ordinary annuity of $80 per year for six years earning a rate of 3% annually?
Note that the $80 that would have been paid for the video projection system would be invested at the end of each year, in other words, we would invest an equal amount every year for six years, hence, the future value formula of an ordinary annuity is the most appropriate to determine the value of the savings after six years
FV=annual savings*(1+r)^N-1/r
annual savings=$80
r=rate of return=3%
N=number of annual savings for 6 years=6
FV=$80*(1+3%)^6-1/3%
FV=$80*(1.03)^6-1/0.03
FV=$80*(1.194052296529-1)/0.03
FV=$80*0.194052296529/0.03
FV=$517.47
brainly.com/question/14761171
#SPJ1
Answer:
Percentage of total return on Investment = <em>ROI = 17% </em>
Explanation:
Let’s
ROI = Return on Investment = ?
D = Dividends = $15
CGD = Capital Gain Distributions = $35
CGS = Capital Gain on Sale = $120
SP = Shares Purchased = 100
CS = Cost per share = $10.00
ROI = (D + CGD + CGS) / (SP * CS)
ROI = ($15 + $35 + $120) / (100 * $10.00)
ROI = 170 / 1,000
ROI = 0.17
Percentage: 0.170 x 100%
<em>ROI = 17% </em>
Answer:
Unit product cost= $67
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Direct materials $30
Direct labor $23
Variable manufacturing overhead $14
<u>Under the variable costing method, the unit product cost is calculated using the direct material, direct labor, and variable manufacturing overhead:</u>
Unit product cost= 30 + 23 + 14= $67
Answer:
im not sure based off of research, but based off of experiance, either a or b.
Explanation: there would be a lot of build-up after more than that.
i apologize if i am incorrect
Answer:
D. Krispy Kreme and Dunkin' Donuts will both choose a price of $0.85.
Explanation:
DD - Dunkin' Donuts
KK - Krispy Kreme
If DD choose price to be $1.25, KK will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $975 among $850 / $975
If DD choose price to be $0.85, KK will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $650 among $250 / $650
Thus, KK have a dominant strategy to choose price = $0.85 no matter what DD choose.
If KK choose price to be $1.25, DD will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $975 among $850 / $975
If KK choose price to be $0.85, DD will choose price to be $0.85 because it gives them profit of $650 among $250 / $650
Thus, DD have a dominant strategy to choose price = $0.85 no matter what KK choose.
Both firms have a dominant strategy of choosing price = $0.85 which creates a Nash equilibrium.
