Answer:
<u>Letter D is correct.</u> It is the value of the unpaid balance on an annuity at the specified point in time.
Explanation:
An ordinary annuity is the making of fixed payments over a fixed period of time. To specify the value of an annuity present in an ordinary annuity, one must know the established interest rates. When interest rates are higher, the present value of the ordinary annuity is reduced, and when interest rates are lower the present value is higher.
Answer:
useful life= 12 years
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Purchase price= $140,000
Salvage value= $20,000
Annual depreciation= $10,000
<u>To calculate the useful life, we need to use the straight-line method formula:</u>
Annual depreciation= (original cost - salvage value)/estimated life (years)
10,000= (140,00 - 20,000) / useful life
10,000useful life = 120,000
useful life= 120,000 / 10,000
useful life= 12 years
Answer:
It will take 25.28 year to have enough to buy the car ( ignoring Inflation effect)
Explanation:
Current Deposit = PV = $49,000
Future Value = FV = $199,000
Interest Rate = r = 5.7%
Use following Formula
FV = PV ( 1 + r )^n
$199,000 = $49,000 ( 1 + 0.057 )^n
$199,000 / $49,000 = ( 1 + 0.057 )^n
4.06 = 1.057^n
Log 4.06 = n log 1.057
n = log 4.06 / log 1.057
n = 25.28
it requires 25.28 year to have an amount to buy the Ferrari.
Answer:
Possible causes of material quantity variance:
1. The use of sub-standard material
2. The use of unskilled labour
3. Wastage of material
Explanation:
Material quantity variance is the difference between standard quantity and actual quantity used multiplied by standard price. The use of sub-standard material reduces the quality of output thereby resulting to unfavorable material quantity variance. The use of unskilled labour also leads to unfavorable material quantity variance. Wastage of material due to low quality of inputs also results to unfavorable material quantity variance.
Answer:
B) countries with higher GDP per person tend to have healthier environments.
Explanation:
According to the 2020 Environmental Performance Index (EPI) elaborated by Yale and Columbia universities, a strong positive correlation exists between high GDP per capita and healthier environments. There are a few exceptions to this correlation, in Asian (especially Arab) countries where GDP per capita might be high, but the vast majority of income is received by a vary small number of people. But in the rest of the world, a high GDP per capita generally results in healthier environments.
