Answer:
112in
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
See the argument below
Step-by-step explanation:
I will give the argument in symbolic form, using rules of inference.
First, let's conclude c.
(1)⇒a by simplification of conjunction
a⇒¬(¬a) by double negation
¬(¬a)∧(2)⇒¬(¬c) by Modus tollens
¬(¬c)⇒c by double negation
Now, the premise (5) is equivalent to ¬d∧¬h which is one of De Morgan's laws. From simplification, we conclude ¬h. We also concluded c before, then by adjunction, we conclude c∧¬h.
An alternative approach to De Morgan's law is the following:
By contradiction proof, assume h is true.
h⇒d∨h by addition
(5)∧(d∨h)⇒¬(d∨h)∧(d∨h), a contradiction. Hence we conclude ¬h.
Answer:
Jane: 37 years old
Anne: 17
Step-by-step explanation:
Jane 12 years ago: 5x
Anne 12 years ago: x
In three years into the future:
Jane: 5x+15
Anne: x+15
CURRENT TIME:
Jane: 5x+12
Anne: x+12
Equation (using 3 years into the future ages): 5x+15=2(x+15)
5x+15=2x+30
(subtract 15 from both sides)
5x=2x+15
3x=15
x=5
Therefore, Jane is 37 years old and Anne is 17 years old.
Answer: See below
Step-by-step explanation:
a) There is a correlation between the number of employees in the plant and the number of products produced yearly. Specifically, a positive correlation exists because, as we can see on the table, as the number of employees increases, the number of products also increases. And the rate of increase is constant.
b) Let the function be: y = mx + b
When x = 0; y = 120
So:
120 = 0 + c
c = 120
Now the slope:

Therefore, the equation that best fits the data is y = 8x + 120
c) The slope in the function represents the constant rate of change, meaning that as the number of employees increases by 1, the number of products produced monthly increases by 20. While the y-intercept of the plot, which is 120, indicates the constant number of products, that is to say, when there are no employees, there are still 120 products.
I think it’s c hope this helps you :)