1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denpristay [2]
3 years ago
7

Why was population a cause of the American Revolution?

History
1 answer:
ElenaW [278]3 years ago
5 0

Population was not a direct cause of American Revolution but if we look from the point of population growth and associate this growth with Taxes and growing unity among the colonists we can say that the increase in population was another reason for the American Revolution. <u>The answer will be The population had grown quickly.</u>

You might be interested in
HURRY PLEASE!!!!
just olya [345]

Option B, to create free trade, is the right answer.

Trade agreements are formed when two or more countries agree on the conditions of commerce among them. The trade agreement are made to boost trade in the process of the economic boost. These agreement achieves its goal by reducing or even eliminating restrictions to trade across international borders and creating an atmosphere for free trade. The trade agreement are made to set up the tariffs and customs that the nations impose on the exports and imports. Countries participating in the trade agreements generally seeks improved opportunities for their business.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The american civil liberties union advertised for a teacher who would be willing to be arrested for teaching ___________________
Musya8 [376]
Evolution.............
4 0
3 years ago
Which event happened first the lousiana purchase the missoury compromise the 1855 kansas election the kansas nebraska act
Lera25 [3.4K]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. Louisiana Purchase by Thomas Jefferson-opened a large territory for the U.S.

2.The Missouri Compromise by Henry Clay which divided the U.S. into free and slave states

3. The Kansas Nebraska Act created by Stephen A. Douglas which allowed the states to decide if they want to be free or slave states(AKA: popular sovereignty)

3 0
3 years ago
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
The self-confident woman, portrayed as fully capable of doing a man's job in posters and on magazine covers during world war ii,
HACTEHA [7]
"Rosie the Riveter" Should be the name that you're looking for.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Who did germany, italy, and japan invade in the 1930s?
    11·1 answer
  • Why do you think we need the bill of rights (1-2 sentences )
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following were parts of President Johnson's "Great Society" programs? Interstate Highway Act Elementary and Seconda
    10·1 answer
  • How did Saint Catherine of Siena become famous
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following was NOT something the West offered to pioneers? A. security B. opportunity C. freedom D. land
    5·2 answers
  • According to the Virginia Plan, one of the proposed powers of the new national government was __________. A. the ability to veto
    7·2 answers
  • When did the seven years war occur
    14·1 answer
  • How Did Transportation Affect Westward Expansion?
    11·2 answers
  • Who fought in the Fredonian Rebellion?! Hurry pls 60 POINT AND BRAINLIEST IF I CAN
    7·2 answers
  • These are questions about The U.S enters world war 1
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!